Home » Pedro Sanchez » Page 2
Tag:

Pedro Sanchez

World

Spain’s NATO spending deal under fire – POLITICO

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor
written by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

NATO Faces Defense Spending Clash With Spain and Belgium

Tensions Rise Over Military Spending Goals

A dispute is brewing within NATO as several nations push back against the alliance’s defense spending targets. The situation puts pressure on collective security goals. Specifically, Spain and Belgium are seeking greater flexibility regarding their financial commitments, creating friction within the group.

Rutte Voices Doubts

Mark Rutte, speaking at a Monday press conference in The Hague, expressed skepticism about Spain’s ability to meet the proposed spending benchmarks. He noted that Spain believes it can achieve targets with 2.1% spending, while NATO insists on 3.5% to meet the requirements. Rutte underscored that NATO operates without exemptions or side deals.

He further stated that nations will now regularly disclose their progress toward achieving top-secret capability goals. Rutte also mentioned a review scheduled for 2029.

“NATO has no opt-out and NATO doesn’t know side deals.”

—Mark Rutte

Currently, the United States allocates approximately 3.5% of its GDP to defense, while many European allies struggle to reach the 2% goal (NATO, 2024).

Belgium Seeks Flexibility

Spain’s challenge to the 5% target has prompted other nations with lower defense expenditures to pursue similar exemptions. Belgium announced on Monday that it would seek “maximum flexibility” from NATO.

“We may not have done so by making a noisy statement like Spain, but I can assure you that for weeks our diplomats have been working hard to obtain the flexibility mechanisms,” Maxime Prévot told local media.

Last week, Bart De Wever informed lawmakers that the Belgian government would support NATO’s new defense spending goal, even though it presents challenges.

The Road Ahead

These developing disagreements spotlight the difficulty of maintaining a unified defense posture among allies with varying financial capabilities and priorities. Further negotiation and potential compromises are anticipated as NATO leaders prepare for their upcoming summit.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
World

White House insists all European countries must spend 5% on defense | International

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor
written by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

Trump Presses Allies on NATO Spending Targets

Spain balks at the U.S. demands, setting up a potential clash at the upcoming summit.

Tensions are rising within NATO as the United States pushes for increased defense spending, specifically targeting European allies. Spain is resisting these pressures, which could lead to significant friction at the upcoming NATO summit in The Hague.

White House Demands and Spanish Resistance

The White House has made its expectations clear: all NATO members must meet the 5% GDP defense spending target. According to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, the U.S. president expects European nations to contribute their “fair share” to mutual defense. She added that the U.S. has invested billions in collective security.

In a letter to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez expressed his country’s reservations. He stated that a 5% commitment would be “unreasonable” and could hinder the EU’s security efforts. Spain’s current military spending is just 1.3% of its GDP.

“The U.S. is looking for everybody to say, ‘Yes, we’re going to do it. We have a plan, we’re going to get to 5%. There’s a real threat on Europe and we have to do more.’ But some of our allies say, ‘yes, 5%, but in reality it’s 3.5% plus 1.5% which could be anything. And if that is overemphasized, it can lead to a clash with the United States,”

—Kurt Volker, Former U.S. ambassador to NATO

Currently, only a handful of NATO members meet the 2% target. Considering the rising global instability, defense spending by NATO members is a central concern. According to a 2024 report, the total defense expenditure by NATO members reached $1.3 trillion, a 17% increase from 2020 (SIPRI 2024).

Summit Preview

Donald Trump is scheduled to attend the NATO summit in the Netherlands next week. During his first term, he pushed for the 2% spending goal. However, upon returning to the White House, he has increased his demands to 5%.

Sánchez‘s government favors spending 3.5% on military equipment, with the remaining 1.5% on infrastructure and other defensive investments.

The summit, set for June 24-25, will likely feature intense discussions about these spending targets and the future of the alliance’s financial commitments.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
World

Spain Seeks NATO Defense Spending Exemption | POLITICO

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor
written by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

NATO Defense Spending Target of 5% GDP Faces Debate Ahead of Summit

Table of Contents

As NATO countries prepare to convene next week for their first summit as Donald Trump‘s return to the White house, a key point of contention is the U.S. president’s demand for members to allocate 5% of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to defense. this target represents a significant increase from the current 2% goal, a level that nations like Spain are only projected to reach this year.

The Push for Increased Defense Spending

The call for increased defense spending comes as geopolitical tensions rise, particularly in Eastern Europe. Several NATO members already struggle to meet the existing 2% target, established in 2006, which aims to ensure adequate investment in national security and collective defense capabilities NATO.

Did You No? In 2024, only 11 of the 31 NATO member countries met the 2% spending target Statista.

Rutte’s Compromise Proposal

in an effort to appease Trump and bridge the divide, outgoing NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has suggested a compromise. His proposal outlines that the 5% target should encompass 3.5% of GDP for core military expenditures, with the remaining 1.5% allocated to defense-related areas such as military mobility and cybersecurity. This broader definition aims to provide flexibility for member states while still demonstrating a commitment to enhanced security.

National Positions and Potential Vetoes

NATO’s decision-making relies on consensus, meaning that any single member state can block a decision. Earlier this month, Spanish Defense Minister Margarita Robles indicated that while Madrid would not prevent other allies from adopting the 5% target, Spain intends to maintain its current 2% commitment. Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has requested either flexible wording to make the target optional or a specific exemption for Spain, emphasizing that the nation can meet its capability targets without reaching the 5% threshold.

Pro Tip: Understanding each member’s economic constraints and security priorities is crucial for navigating these negotiations.

in contrast, Swedish political parties recently reached an agreement to meet the 5% target by 2032, planning to borrow 300 billion krona (€27 billion) to achieve this goal. This commitment underscores the varying levels of ambition and financial capacity among NATO members.

Capability Targets vs. Spending Targets

Sánchez has argued that Spain can fulfill its so-called capability targets-new objectives for weapons inventory agreed upon by NATO defense ministers-without needing to spend 5% of its GDP. This highlights a debate over whether raw spending figures accurately reflect a nation’s contribution to collective defense.

Country Position on 5% Target Rationale
Spain Resisting believes it can meet capability targets with 2% spending.
Sweden committed Agreed to meet the target by 2032, including borrowing funds.
U.S. Advocating President Trump wants all members to increase defense spending.

The Road Ahead

The upcoming NATO summit will be a critical test of the alliance’s unity and resolve. Balancing the demands for increased defense spending with the diverse economic realities and security priorities of its members will require careful negotiation and compromise. The outcome will shape the future of transatlantic security cooperation and the distribution of the defense burden within the alliance.

What impact will these spending debates have on NATO’s overall effectiveness? how can NATO ensure that defense spending translates into tangible security improvements?

Evergreen Insights: NATO defense Spending

NATO’s defense spending targets have been a recurring point of discussion, particularly during administrations in the United States that have pushed for greater burden-sharing among allies. The 2% target,established in 2006,was intended to address concerns that some member states were not adequately investing in their own defense capabilities,thereby relying disproportionately on the United States.

The debate over defense spending reflects broader questions about the distribution of security responsibilities within the alliance and the relative contributions of different member states. While some countries have consistently met or exceeded the 2% target, others have struggled to reach this benchmark due to economic constraints or differing security priorities. The push for a 5% target represents a significant escalation of these demands and raises complex questions about affordability, feasibility, and the overall effectiveness of defense spending.

FAQ: NATO Defense Spending Target

Why is NATO considering a 5% GDP defense spending target?

The proposed 5% GDP defense spending target is largely driven by calls from the U.S. to increase burden-sharing among NATO allies, particularly with the return of Donald Trump to the White House. The aim is to ensure that all member states are adequately contributing to collective defense.

What is the current NATO defense spending target?

The current NATO defense spending target is 2% of GDP. Many member states are still working towards achieving this existing benchmark.

Which countries support the 5% NATO defense spending target?

While there is broad support for increased defense spending among NATO allies, some countries like Sweden have committed to meeting the 5% target by 2032. Other nations are hesitant and seeking flexible arrangements.

What are ‘capability targets’ in the context of NATO defense spending?

capability targets refer to specific objectives for weapons inventory and military readiness agreed upon by NATO defense ministers. Some countries, like Spain, argue they can meet these targets without reaching the 5% GDP spending level.

How does NATO make decisions about defense spending?

NATO’s decision-making process operates on a consensus basis,meaning that all 32 member states must agree. Any single member can potentially block a decision with a veto.

What is the proposed compromise for the 5% defense spending target?

A proposed compromise suggests allocating 3.5% of GDP to purely military expenditures and 1.5% to defense-related items like military mobility and cybersecurity. This aims to broaden the scope of what counts towards the target.

What are the potential implications of failing to meet NATO defense spending targets?

Failing to meet NATO defense spending targets could strain relationships within the alliance, particularly with countries like the U.S.that advocate for increased burden-sharing. It could also raise concerns about the overall readiness and effectiveness of NATO’s collective defense capabilities.

Share your thoughts: How should NATO balance defense spending with other national priorities? Subscribe for more updates on global security.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Venezuela: Arrest Warrant Sought for Guaidó in Spain Corruption Case

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com
written by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

“`html


Venezuela Seeks Juan Guaidó Arrest Over Alleged Oil deal Corruption in Spain

Table of Contents

Venezuela’s Attorney General Tarek William Saab announced Friday that his office will investigate Juan Guaidó, the exiled opposition leader, for alleged corruption linked to a case shaking Spain, and seek an international arrest warrant via Interpol [[1]]. The accusations stem from leaked audios suggesting Guaidó offered a lucrative oil deal to Spanish officials in exchange for political recognition.

Details of the Alleged Corruption Scheme

The controversy centers on audios purportedly between José luis Ábalos, a former Spanish minister, and koldo garcía, his advisor. These recordings allegedly reveal discussions about a potential oil agreement brokered by Guaidó,offering commissions of €500,000 per month for three years to high-ranking Spanish government figures in return for recognizing him as Venezuela’s interim president.

Did You Know? The Spanish Civil Guard uncovered these audios during a broader corruption investigation within the Socialist Party.

According to Saab, this new investigation adds to the existing 29 cases the Public Ministry has against Guaidó, who currently resides in Miami with his family. The charges against Guaidó include usurpation of functions, money laundering, treason, and conspiracy [[1]].

Guaidó’s Response to the Allegations

In response to the surfacing of these audios,Guaidó took to social media platform X to defend himself. He stated,”This explains why [Spanish Prime Minister Pedro] Sánchez did not receive me in 2020,why the Lima group sabotaged [efforts],and why he chose to approach Maduro.They were not interested in democracy in Venezuela. What they were looking for was a ‘ball.'”

The Spanish Connection: Ábalos and García

The leaked audios reveal that Koldo García, an advisor to former Minister Ábalos, claimed to have facilitated contact between Guaidó’s team and officials within the Spanish government, including José Manuel albares, who was then Secretary General of International Affairs. García suggested that Guaidó’s team was grateful for Ábalos’s efforts to secure recognition from the Spanish government and offered them control of a Venezuelan oil company based in the United States.

Pro Tip: Political corruption cases often involve complex networks of individuals and financial incentives, making them tough to investigate and prosecute.

The audios further suggest that García stood to gain a commission of €500,000 per month for three years for mediating the oil agreement. Ábalos, in the recordings, appears to acknowledge the potential financial benefits of the deal.

Venezuela’s Political Landscape

Venezuela has been in a state of political and economic turmoil for years [[2]]. the country faces hyperinflation,shortages of basic goods,and a mass exodus of its citizens. The political situation is characterized by a power struggle between the ruling socialist party and the opposition, with accusations of corruption and human rights abuses on both sides.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Government Allows Impact of PP and Junts’ Rejection of Pension Increase to Unfold in Spain

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com
written by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

the Spanish government faced an unexpected political setback this week as the Generales”>PP and supported by Junts, delivered a decisive blow, marking ‌the first time the government has ⁣lost a majority‍ on ⁤a key issue⁣ as Pedro Sánchez took office.

the ​rejection of the decree has sparked a fierce political battle, with​ both the government and the opposition scrambling to control the narrative. According to government sources,⁢ the Executive had hoped that the pressure of ‍being responsible for 12​ million retirees and millions of public transport users would ⁣force the opposition to ​relent. However, the PP and Junts stood firm, ⁣choosing ⁣to “take that risk to deliver a political blow to the Executive.” This decision has left the government scrambling to mitigate the fallout, particularly among pensioners, a key voting bloc for both⁤ the⁤ PSOE and ​the PP.

Despite the setback, January pensions will still be paid with the planned increases—2.8% for general pensions, 6% ⁣for ⁤minimum ⁣pensions, and 9% for​ welfare pensions—as there is no time to reverse ‌the payments. However, the real crisis‍ looms in February, when pensions could revert⁢ to December levels if a new decree is not approved. The government now faces a race against time to pass a revised decree through congress, while simultaneously directing public pressure toward the PP.

The rejection of the decree has also reignited debates about pension policies under previous administrations.⁤ The​ government has been speedy to remind voters that ‍it has consistently raised pensions in line with⁣ the CPI, unlike the PP, which under Mariano Rajoy introduced‌ a correction system that could‍ have reduced pension values. ⁣This historical context⁣ is highly likely to play ‍a central role⁢ in the government’s strategy to regain public support.

Below ⁤is a⁣ summary of the key points and implications of the⁢ rejected decree:

| Aspect ‍ ⁤ ​ | Details ‌ ⁣ ​ ⁢ ⁢ ⁣ ⁤ ‌ |
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Pension Increases | 2.8% ⁣general, 6% minimum, 9% welfare pensions (January payments ⁢unaffected)‌ |
| February Risk ⁣| Pensions could revert to December levels if ‌no new decree⁣ is passed |
| Political Fallout |⁤ First major defeat for the government on a key issue under Sánchez ​ |
| Opposition Strategy | PP and Junts united ⁤to deliver a political blow to the executive ​ |
| public Pressure ⁢ | ‍Government aims to direct blame toward the ​PP, especially among pensioners |

The coming weeks will‍ be critical ⁢as the government seeks to navigate this crisis. With mid-February as the ‍deadline, ‌the Executive must decide whether to push for a ‌new decree or explore alternative solutions. Meanwhile, the opposition will likely continue to ⁣capitalize on this moment of vulnerability, setting the stage for a high-stakes political showdown. For now, the fate of⁤ millions of retirees and public transport users hangs in the balance, as the government and opposition engage​ in a battle of narratives⁢ and strategies.The Spanish government is bracing for a high-stakes political battle over pensions, with the Executive‍ determined to‍ highlight its achievements in raising them while shifting blame onto the⁢ opposition for ⁣potential setbacks.⁤ The debate, which has become a focal ⁤point ⁤of recent ​electoral campaigns,⁤ has seen the PSOE and sumar capitalize on the issue,‍ leaving the PP struggling⁢ to regain ground.‍ However, the government⁢ now faces the⁣ challenge of ensuring that​ 12 million citizens⁣ do not see their incomes shrink in February compared to January. ‍

The Executive’s stance is clear: it wants citizens to ​understand that the ⁢opposition’s actions ⁤have real-world consequences. “When you see ⁤your pension go down in February, let the pensioner know that ​it has been the PP in the company of others,” declared Félix Bolaños, Sánchez’s chief negotiator, during a session in Congress. Similarly, he ‍added, “And when ⁢public transport goes up tomorrow, let them know that it was ⁤the PP in the company of others.”

The‍ PP has ⁣already introduced an initiative in ‌Congress, arguing that the government could approve the revaluation of pensions immediately if​ it wished. Simultaneously occurring, Junts has proposed a separate decree focusing solely on pensions, public transportation, and‌ aid for dana. Despite the recent overturning ‍of a key decree, Junts ⁤has shown some willingness to collaborate, ‌as evidenced by their vote⁤ with the majority in the Permanent Deputation to block five ministerial appearances requested by the PP. ‍

Negotiations with Junts are now back on the table, with the government seeking a compromise to restore the pension⁢ increases that⁣ were recently reversed. though, Junts remains​ critical ⁣of the PSOE, accusing it‍ of failing to⁤ fulfill ‌agreements made a year ago, particularly regarding the transfer​ of immigration powers to the Generalitat.

The government’s ‍strategy​ appears to be⁣ twofold: to emphasize ⁤its role in raising pensions and to place the blame squarely on the PP for any negative⁣ outcomes. This‌ approach aims to rally public support‍ by framing the ⁢opposition’s actions as detrimental to millions of citizens. ⁢

| Key Points ‌ | Details ⁤ ⁢ ⁤ ‍ ‍ ⁤ ⁤ ⁤ ‌ ⁣ |
|————————————|—————————————————————————–|
| Government’s Position ‌ | Highlights pension increases, blames PP for potential setbacks. ​ ⁤​ ⁤ ​ |
| PP’s Initiative ⁤ ⁤ | Proposes immediate pension revaluation‍ in Congress.|
| Junts’ proposal ⁤ ​ ​ ​ | Calls for a decree ⁢focused on pensions, public transport, and dana aid. ⁣ |
| ​ Negotiations ‍ ⁤ | Ongoing talks ⁣with ​Junts to restore ‌reversed pension increases.|
| Public Messaging | Félix Bolaños emphasizes PP’s role in potential pension cuts. ⁤ ​ |

As the political‍ drama unfolds, the​ government’s ability to withstand this pressure will be tested. The coming weeks will reveal whether it can navigate this complex landscape and secure the support needed to protect pensioners’ incomes.⁣ For​ now,the ⁤message to citizens is clear: ‌the opposition’s actions have consequences,and the government⁤ is determined to hold them accountable.
Headline:

Expert Insights: Navigating Spain’s Pension⁣ Storm – A Conversation with Dr. Anarawnorah del⁤ Bosque

Introduction:

In the wake of Spain’s Congress of ‍Deputies ⁢rejecting the goverment’s ‌omnibus decree, which included significant pension increases, politicaltempers have flared, and⁢ the future of millions of retirees and ⁢public transport users hangs in ⁣the balance. Dr. Anarawnorah ‍del⁣ Bosque, ⁤a renowned ⁣political scientist‌ and pension policy expert, ⁣joins us today to shed light ​on this pressing​ issue.

1. The Rejected Decree: A Major Political‌ Setback

Senior Editor (SE): Dr. del⁤ Bosque,the government’s omnibus decree,which included a 2.8% pension increase, was a cornerstone of its ⁤social policy. However, the opposition led ‌by the PP and Junts rejected it. Why was this such a significant setback for the government?

Dr. Anarawnorah del Bosque (ADB): ‍Thank you for having ⁣me.⁤ Yes, the rejection​ was indeed ⁣a major blow for⁤ the government. This was the first time Pedro Sánchez’s management has lost a ‍majority​ on a‍ key issue. The‌ decree wasn’t just about pension increases; it also ⁤included measures to freeze transport fares, affecting​ millions⁤ of citizens. The opposition’s decisive move ‍has put the ⁢government on the defensive ​and ⁣added pressure to find⁣ a swift solution.

2. The PP and Junts’⁣ Calculated Risk

SE: ​The PP and⁣ Junts chose to‍ “take that risk to deliver ‍a political blow to the Executive.” ⁤Why did they believe this was the right strategy?

ADB: Both the PP and‌ Junts calculated that they had little to‌ lose from this move. They’ve⁤ been critical of the​ government’s economic management, and⁣ opposing the decree allowed them to position themselves⁣ as defenders of ⁣citizens’ rights. ⁣Moreover, they likely calculated that the potential⁤ backlash from pensioners woudl⁢ be​ manageable, given ​the elections are ‍not ‍immediately on the horizon.

3.The​ Pension Time Bomb Ticking

SE: ‍ Despite the⁣ January pension increases ⁤being paid out, there’s a real crisis looming in February. Can you explain ‍the​ urgency⁢ of ⁢the‍ situation?

ADB: ⁣ Absolutely.⁤ While January’s pensions are secure, come February, pensions coudl ⁢revert to December levels if a new ​decree isn’t⁣ approved. This creates a real sense of urgency for the government. Pensioners‌ are a significant voting⁢ bloc,​ and the government can’t⁢ afford⁣ to let ‌their ⁣incomes ⁤slide,⁣ especially so close to potential elections.

4. ⁣The Government’s Strategy: Highlighting Increases, Blaming the ⁢Opposition

SE: ⁢ The‍ government seems ​determined to emphasize its role in raising pensions and place the blame squarely on ‍the PP. How effective is this strategy likely to be?

ADB: This strategy has some merit, as historical data shows ⁤that the PSOE has generally been more favorable towards pension increases. However, it’s a ⁣delicate balance. The ‌government must ‍ensure it doesn’t come across as trying‍ to exploit pensioners ‍for political gain. If prosperous, this ‍strategy‍ could help rally public support and​ pressure the opposition.But if‍ mishandled, it‍ could backfire.

5. The ‍Way Forward: A Race Against Time

SE: With mid-February​ looming, what are the government’s most likely next steps?

ADB: The government has a few options, ​but time is pressuring. ‌They could​ push for a new decree, which would ⁢require cooperation from the ​opposition. alternatively,⁢ they ⁢might explore choice legislative ‍avenues or ⁣even‍ remarkable measures.⁣ The coming weeks will ‌truly test the government’s ​negotiating skills and ability to withstand political pressure.

6. ​The ⁤Broader Implications

SE: Beyond the immediate pension crisis, what broader⁢ implications could this political drama have?

ADB: This drama⁣ could significantly‌ shape the political⁣ landscape ⁤heading into upcoming elections. It’s put the government on the defensive and given the opposition‍ fresh ‌ammunition. How each ⁢side​ navigates this crisis⁢ could sway voter perceptions and influence election outcomes. Moreover, it’s drawn⁤ renewed attention to pension policy, potentially shifting the narrative in favor ​of ⁣those advocating for more substantial reforms.

SE: Dr.Anarawnorah del Bosque, ‌thank you for your insightful analysis. The⁤ road ahead certainly seems challenging,but your expertise has doubtless helped clarify the complex⁣ political landscape surrounding Spain’s pension crisis.

ADB: My pleasure. It’s a critical time for Spain, ‌and I ⁢hope my insights have brought some clarity to the situation.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Spanish government approves tax reform that eliminates special tax on energy

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com
written by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

Madrid. The Spanish government, chaired by the socialist Pedro Sánchez, managed to carry out a broad tax reform in the Congress of Deputies, where after its arduous negotiation with the rest of the parliamentary groups, it achieved its approval by 178 votes in favor compared to 171 in against. The new law was supported by the pro-independence and national left parties, but also by the nationalist right of the Basque Country and Catalonia, which in exchange for their support asked that the special tax on the energy sector not be renewed, due to the close relationship between These matches with multinationals such as Iberdrola, which has its headquarters in Bilbao, or Repsol and Naturgy. The Podemos party, which with its four deputies was the most reluctant to take on this issue, finally gave in in exchange for a “negotiating commission” to be set up in the immediate future to address this reform, which in any case would not support even the Basque Nationalist Party (PNV) or Junts per Catalunya (JxCat).

In any case, the Spanish coalition government, made up of the Spanish Socialist Workers Party (PSOE) and Sumar, managed to approve one of the most important fiscal plans in recent years, with which it aspires to raise just over four billion euros more annually. In the fiscal package there are important items, such as the tax increase on fuel and diesel, but above all to the banking sector, by maintaining the tax that was created in a decree of measures for the war in Ukraine and that was going to expire next December 31. The approved tax rate will be 7 percent for financial entities whose interest and commission margin exceeds five billion euros, which are the majority of the hegemonic groups in the country. In this way, the rate would be 1 percent up to 750 million, 3.5 percent up to 1.5 billion, 4.8 percent up to 3 billion, 6 percent up to 5 billion and 7% from five billion onwards.

In addition, the reform includes an increase of two percentage points for savings income exceeding 300 thousand euros, from 28 to 30 percent, in addition to regulatory changes to strengthen the fight against tax fraud in the hydrocarbon sector. Also, as a health prevention measure, vapers will be taxed and tobacco taxes will be increased, in addition to the modification of the European VAT directive that allows the tax to be applied to tourist rentals or the promotion of electronic invoices.

In the midst of parliamentary negotiations for the reform, the most powerful multinationals in the energy sector, such as Endesa, Iberdrola, Repsol and Naturgy, issued a public warning to the government if the special tax on the sector is finally approved, which was ultimately not approved. Energy companies warned that more than 30 billion euros in investments for the coming years would be put at risk, in addition to the development and economic viability of the projects already underway.


#Spanish #government #approves #tax #reform #eliminates #special #tax #energy
–

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: contact@world-today-news.com

Key Figure Role