Tanker Companies Reroute, Rates Surge Amid Middle East Tensions

Amid escalating geopolitical tensions between Israel and Iran, global tanker operators and shipping authorities are proactively altering routes and reassessing risks, even without a formal closure of the Strait of Hormuz. These adjustments are already impacting freight schedules,insurance costs,and overall sentiment in the energy market.

Tanker Bookings Plummet, Freight Rates Soar

Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) bookings from the Middle East to Asia experienced a sharp decline recently, with freight rates jumping over 20% to approximately Worldscale 55. this prompted manny tanker owners to adopt a cautious “wait and see” approach. While vessels remain available for outbound charters, new contracts are dwindling, signaling widespread market apprehension.

Smaller shipowners are also holding back vessel offers, effectively pricing export charters out of the Gulf unless risk terms are adjusted. Clean-product tanker rates are also under pressure, with voyage costs from the Gulf to Asia now quoted around $4.5 million, up from $3.3-3.5 million.

did You Know? The Strait of Hormuz is a vital waterway through which approximately 21 million barrels of oil pass daily, representing about 21% of global petroleum consumption. (Source: U.S. Energy Information Management)

frontline Suspends Gulf Bookings

Frontline, one of the world’s largest oil tanker companies, has suspended new bookings for Gulf voyages. CEO lars Barstad stated that vessels already in the region would depart under naval convoy, acknowledging that trade will become less efficient and security will come at a premium.

Other major tanker firms are also avoiding Gulf contracts due to growing concerns about potential retaliatory actions by Iran following recent Israeli strikes. This shrinking capacity could exert pressure on regional and global fuel prices.

Insurance Premiums Surge

The tightening of tanker availability is directly impacting insurance markets. War-risk insurance for tankers traversing Gulf waters now requires an additional $3-$8 per barrel, significantly increasing transport costs and influencing crude trade economics.

Maritime Agencies Issue warnings

Ports and maritime agencies are implementing precautionary measures. The Greek shipping ministry has instructed Greek-flagged vessels to report travel through high-risk zones like the Gulf of Aden or Hormuz, mandating detailed voyage logs. Similarly, the UK Maritime Trade Operations advises minimal crew deployment on deck and strict reporting protocols, treating these waters as potential conflict zones.

Pro Tip: Regularly monitor maritime security advisories from organizations like the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and national maritime authorities for the latest risk assessments and recommended safety measures.

Evolving maritime Threats

Maritime-security experts highlight a range of threats, including naval shadowing, electronic jamming, and state-linked disruptive tactics. GPS spoofing and navigational interference events are also raising alarms among insurers and shippers.

While Brent crude prices have slightly decreased, reflecting a partial unwinding of initial fears, the underlying vulnerabilities remain. Refined-product tankers are also feeling the pressure,with voyage costs from the Gulf to Asia rising sharply.

IMO Flags Route Diversions

The IMO has noted an increase in diverted routes, with vessels avoiding the Red Sea and Suez canal in favor of longer routes around the southern coast of Africa, despite the increased risk of piracy.

The current situation underscores that uncertainty alone can impact the market. Shorter tanker routes, higher war-risk premiums, and stricter fill levels can render oversupply fragile, reflecting a narrowing of physical glut rather than just headline supply figures.

Key Indicators to watch

Governments and carriers are closely monitoring freight rates,insurance clauses,and official advisories. A surge in premiums or new route warnings would indicate that tanker risk is structural, potentially leading to ongoing volatility even without direct attacks.

If iran or its proxies begin targeting tankers, the industry may further retreat. MSC, for exmaple, rerouted container vessels away from drone threats in the Indian Ocean, causing transit delays. Western-linked ships may avoid entire zones, leading to capacity crunches.

national navies may respond, but shipping firms are acting frist. This cascade-operators opting out, insurers hiking rates, freight indices jumping-reflects an understanding of strategic shock. India, China, and other major refining nations are closely monitoring the situation, as even minor maritime unrest can trigger bunker price swings.

while diplomatic efforts continue,markets are now pivoting on the actions of tanker companies,making their behaviour a key predictor of potential supply shocks.

How do you think these rerouting decisions will affect consumer prices? What long-term strategies can mitigate these risks?

Disclaimer: This article provides general information and should not be construed as financial or legal advice.Consult with qualified professionals for specific guidance.

Share this article and join the conversation! Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on global energy markets.