NAPOLCOM Reverses PNP Chief’s Appointments in Command Shakeup
Table of Contents
Manila,Philippines – In a decisive move asserting its constitutional authority,the National Police commission (NAPOLCOM) issued a resolution on August 14,2025,reversing recent personnel decisions made by Philippine National Police (PNP) Chief Police General Nicolas Torre III. The action underscores the ongoing dynamic between the PNP and its oversight body, impacting key leadership positions within the national police force.
NAPOLCOM’s Resolution 2025-0531 directs the reinstatement of Police Lieutenant general Jose Melencio Nartatez to his former role as Deputy Chief for Administration and Police Lieutenant General Bernard Banac as commander of the Area Police Command (APC) Western Mindanao. The commission cited Section 6, Article XVI of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, which mandates that the state maintain a national police force “to be administered and controlled by a national police commission.” This constitutional provision forms the bedrock of NAPOLCOM’s oversight role.
Did You No? the 1987 Constitution was ratified on February 2, 1987, establishing the framework for the current Philippine government, including the role of NAPOLCOM in police administration.
Details of the Reassignments
The resolution effectively nullifies a recent reshuffling of key PNP officials initiated by General Torre III. NAPOLCOM persistent that these assignments were made without the required review and approval of the commission en banc, headed by Interior and Local Government Secretary Jonvic Remulla. Any designation, assignment, or reassignment lacking this prior confirmation is considered ineffective, and non-compliance may lead to administrative sanctions.
The following officials are affected by the NAPOLCOM directive:
| Official | Previous Position | New Position |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Alexander Morico II | APC Visayas Commander | NCPRO Regional Director |
| Anthony Aberin | NCPRO Regional Director | CIDG Director |
| Christopher Abrahano | CIDG Acting director | Officer-in-Charge, APC visayas |
| Paul Kenneth Lucas | Deputy Regional Director for administration of NCRPO | Regional Director of PRO4-A |
| Jack Wanky | Regional Director of PRO4-A | Deputy Regional Director for Administration of NCRPO |
| Romeo Macapaz | Regional Director, PRO 12 | Personnel Holding and Accounting Unit |
| Arnold Ardiente | Ex-O, APC Visayas | Regional Director, PRO 12 |
| William Segun | Director, Highway Patrol Group | Personnel Holding and Accounting Unit |
| Hansel marantan | Acting Chief, Peace Process And Development center, OCPNP | Director, Highway Patrol Group |
| Jonathan Abella | Personnel Holding and Accounting Unit | Acting Director, EOD K9 |
| Arnold Rosero | Acting Director, EOD K9 | Deputy Director for Administration, EOD K9 |
Pro Tip: Understanding the interplay between the PNP and NAPOLCOM is crucial for grasping the dynamics of law enforcement administration in the Philippines.
PNP Support Despite NAPOLCOM Decision
Despite the NAPOLCOM resolution,several Police Regional Offices have publicly voiced their support for PNP Chief Torre III. The National Capital Region Police Office (NCRPO) issued a statement affirming “unshakeable support” for the PNP chief and his directives, citing Section 26 of Republic Act 6975, also known as the DILG Act of 1990. The Police Regional Office CAR (Cordillera Administrative Region) echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the legality and necessity of command adjustments for an efficient police force.
What implications might this show of support have for the future relationship between the PNP and NAPOLCOM? How will this situation affect operational effectiveness within the police force?
as of this report, General Torre III has not released a public statement regarding NAPOLCOM’s decision.
Contextual Background: NAPOLCOM and PNP
The relationship between the NAPOLCOM and the PNP has historically been characterized by a balance of authority. While the PNP Chief holds operational command, NAPOLCOM provides policy direction and administrative oversight. This structure aims to ensure accountability and prevent abuse of power within the police force. The current situation highlights the importance of maintaining this balance and adhering to constitutional mandates. Recent years have seen increased scrutiny of police conduct and calls for greater civilian oversight, further emphasizing the role of NAPOLCOM.
Frequently Asked Questions about NAPOLCOM and the PNP
- What is NAPOLCOM’s primary role? NAPOLCOM is responsible for the administration and control of the Philippine national Police, ensuring adherence to constitutional mandates and establishing policies.
- What is the significance of Resolution 2025-0531? This resolution reaffirms NAPOLCOM’s authority to review and modify personnel decisions made by the PNP Chief.
- What is Republic Act 6975? Also known as the DILG Act of 1990, this law outlines the powers and functions of the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) and its relationship with the PNP.
- How does this affect the PNP’s operations? The reassignment of key officials may temporarily disrupt operations, but the goal is to ensure compliance with legal procedures and maintain accountability.
- What are the potential consequences of non-compliance with NAPOLCOM directives? Accountable officers may face administrative sanctions for failing to comply with NAPOLCOM requirements.
We hope this report provides valuable insight into this developing story.Please share this article with your network and join the conversation in the comments below. Don’t forget to subscribe to World Today News for the latest updates and in-depth analysis.