Here’s a rewritten version of the provided text,aiming for 100% uniqueness while preserving all verifiable facts:
A document obtained by this newspaper reveals that the Public Ministry pointed to judge Rus,who found no “criminal relevance” in up to nine emails.These emails were reportedly sent to Montoro by his chief of cabinet, Felipe Martínez Rico, concerning the figure of “time.” The Public Ministry’s opinion, which described this figure as “suigeneris,” has been met with a recommendation that it review Article 95 of the General Law.This specific article stipulates that reports, data, or background facts acquired by the Tax administration are confidential. Their use is restricted solely to the effective request of taxes or the imposition of sanctions. This provision safeguards the privacy of tax information, limiting its application to tax administration and preventing its disclosure to external parties.
However, this has not been the case in this particular instance for some time. Consequently,the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office’s failure to identify criminal activity in Montoro’s personal monitoring,conducted by his close team,has been described as “very surprising.” Moreover, the decision not to include these emails in the criminal case that led to his conviction at the Provincial Court of Madrid has also been questioned. The author stated, “Because anti-corruption had them. And he did not contribute them. In this case, I allow me to question the credibility of the Prosecutor’s Office.”
The author expressed disbelief that the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office possessed these emails for years prior and did not submit them to the case. “Because those ‘mails’ indicate a political interference in a tax cause even before that cause was formalized; it is very important from the point of view of my defense and my rights,” the author added.
Rajoy’s Government
When questioned about the potential reasons for former Finance Minister Montoro’s focus on his fiscal data, the author declined to speculate. Instead, the responsibility for providing explanations was shifted to the now-investigated individual. “Ask Cristóbal Montoro, and if he in turn passed it – the information of his fiscal life – to his boss,” the author suggested, referring to Mariano Rajoy, the then-president of the Government. The author also expressed surprise that the individual “deserved the attention of the government once a month,” noting that reports to Minister Montoro regarding the progress of proceedings against “time” were monthly in 2015, according to the investigation.
Commenting on the administration at the time, the author stated, “That was the government we had,” referring to Rajoy’s executive. The author also clarified that “nothing has happened to the PSOE,” adding,”I have had several socialist ministers being a taxpayer and nothing has never happened to me.”