A Look at the Potential Impact of the High Unemployment Hardship Exception to Medicaid Work Requirements
The implementation of work requirements for Medicaid โฃexpansion enrollees has included a hardship exception for individuals residing in areas with high unemployment. Analysis reveals a nuanced picture of who might benefit from this exception, with a notable disparity between where qualifying counties are located and where the potentially exempt enrollees actually live.
While a substantial majority – 80% โ- of countiesโค meeting theโ statutory criteria for high unemployment are rural,โข the impact ofโ this exception is largely concentrated among those in urban areas. Over โค80% of the 1.4 million โขexpansion enrollees who โฃ could qualify for exemption due to high unemployment โlive in urban counties. thisโค is due to the smaller population sizes in rural areas; even though โa slightly higher percentage of rural counties in expansionโข states meet the unemployment threshold (8.5% versus 7% of all counties), the sheer number of potential beneficiaries is far greater in urban centers. Specifically,only 273,350 (19%) of those potentially eligible reside in rural counties,representing just 10% โof all expansion enrollees living in rural areas.
The concentration of these potentially exempt enrollees is also geographically โlimited. Nine in ten expansion enrollees living in high-unemployment counties and eligible for the exception are located in justโ five states: California, New York, Michigan, Kentucky, and Ohio. California alone accounts for over half of this population. A particularly striking example is New York’s Bronx County, which is theโค only county in the state to meet the high unemployment criteria and is home to over 260,000 expansion enrollees -โฃ 18% of all โฃthose nationally who could be exempt.
moreover, the political landscape appears to play โa role.93% of enrollees who could be exempt โขreside in states with Democratic governors, who are more likely to request the exception on behalf of their residents.
The impact of the hardship exception is limitedโ across the majority of expansion states. In nine states,fewer than 2,000 expansion enrollees liveโค in qualifying counties,and in seventeen states,no counties meet โฃthe criteria atโข all.
This pattern holds true for rural expansionโค enrollees as well. Half of the 273,350 rural expansion enrollees potentially eligible for the exception live in kentucky and michigan. โขadditional concentrations are found in California (14%), Oregon (6%), and Arizona, Louisiana, and Ohio (5% each). only 10% of rural expansion enrollees liveโ in counties that meetโ the high unemployment criteria, and noโฃ ruralโค counties qualify in 20โ expansion states.
These findings suggest that while the high โunemployment hardship exception โis intended to provide adaptability for individuals โin economically distressed areas,its practical effect will be most pronounced in specificโ urban counties and โa handful of states.