Frequent Ejaculation Linked to Lower Prostate Cancer Risk,Landmark Studies Suggest
Boston,MA – New analysis of decades-long research indicates a potential link between higher ejaculation frequency and a reduced risk of prostate cancer,offering a novel avenue for understanding the disease.While the exact causes of prostate cancer remain complex, involving genetics, diet, and lifestyle, findings from Harvard University and Australian researchers suggest a protective effect from regular sexual activity.
A comprehensive study initiated by Harvard University in 1986, following nearly 30,000 health professionals, examined the correlation between ejaculation frequency and prostate cancer incidence. The research revealed that men reporting 21 or more ejaculations per month experienced a 31% reduction in prostate cancer risk compared to those ejaculating between 4 and 7 times monthly. This trend persisted even after accounting for other lifestyle and medical factors.
The harvard study isn’t an outlier. A separate survey conducted in Australia, encompassing 2,338 men, corroborated these findings. Men engaging in sexual activity 4.6 to 7 times per week demonstrated a 36% lower risk of developing prostate cancer before the age of 70,compared to those with a frequency of less than 2.3 times weekly. The protective effect was observed across all age groups, though most pronounced during early adulthood.
Researchers hypothesize that these results may point to early biological processes within the prostate gland influencing long-term cancer risk. They draw parallels to other conditions, such as childhood sunburn increasing melanoma risk later in life. Though,scientists emphasize the need for continued examination to fully elucidate the underlying mechanisms. The studies do not establish a causal relationship, but rather highlight a significant correlation warranting further exploration.
Prostate cancer remains one of the most common cancers affecting men worldwide.These findings offer a possibly valuable insight into preventative measures, though experts caution against drawing definitive conclusions without additional research.
