Smithsonian Defies Trump, Reasserts Control Amid Portrait Gallery Controversy

A power struggle is brewing in Washington D.C. as the Smithsonian Institution publicly challenged President Trump’s authority. This clash centers around the attempted dismissal of Kim Sajet, the director of the National Portrait Gallery, and raises questions about the independence of the Smithsonian.

The Smithsonian’s Board of Regents, which includes Vice President JD Vance, convened to discuss the situation. Their statement emphasized that “all personnel decisions are made by and subject to the direction of the secretary, with oversight by the board,” directly countering Trump’s claim of having fired Sajet.

Smithsonian Board Reaffirms Autonomy

The Smithsonian’s statement, released after the Board of Regents meeting, explicitly supports Secretary Lonnie G. Bunch’s authority and management of the institution.This move signals a firm stance against what many perceive as political interference from the Trump administration.

The board further directed Bunch to ensure the institution maintains its nonpartisan nature, tasking him with articulating expectations to museum directors regarding the content displayed and allowing time for adjustments to ensure unbiased presentations.

Did You No? The Smithsonian institution receives approximately two-thirds of its $1 billion annual funding from the federal government, highlighting the complex relationship between the institution and the government.

trump’s Rationale and the DEI Debate

President Trump’s initial announcement of sajet’s firing cited her support for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives as the primary reason. The White House provided a list of grievances to the New York Times, alleging acts of partisanship and public comments on racial and gender inequality.

This action aligns with a broader effort by the Trump administration to exert influence over cultural matters in Washington. Trump now chairs the board at the John F. Kennedy Centre for the Performing Arts, where an ally has assumed the role of interim director.

Bunch’s Response and Internal Review

In an email to Smithsonian employees, Secretary Bunch acknowledged the need for the institution to examine its exhibitions, programs, and presentations. He stated that while most content is rooted in research and analysis, some work has occasionally deviated from institutional values of scholarship and nonpartisanship.

Bunch committed to evaluating the need for changes to policies, procedures, or personnel.This internal review aims to address concerns about potential bias and ensure the Smithsonian remains a welcoming place for all Americans.

Budget Cuts and Broader Concerns

Beyond the personnel dispute, the Smithsonian faces proposed budget cuts of 12 percent. Sajet highlighted the potential impact of these cuts, including staff reductions at the planned National Museum of the American Latino and the potential closure of the Anacostia Community Museum.

These proposed cuts, coupled with the attempt to remove Sajet, have fueled concerns about the Trump administration’s broader agenda for the Smithsonian. Critics argue that these actions represent an effort to reshape the institution and align it with the president’s political views.

The Question of Presidential authority

The Smithsonian has historically operated independently of the executive branch, raising questions about the president’s legal authority to fire Sajet. The Board of Regents has reaffirmed its autonomy in operating the cultural complex, emphasizing its role in overseeing personnel decisions.

This power struggle underscores the delicate balance between presidential influence and the independence of cultural institutions. The outcome of this dispute could have notable implications for the future of the Smithsonian and other organizations that receive federal funding.

Pro Tip: Stay informed about the leadership and governance structures of cultural institutions to better understand their relationship with political entities.

Reactions and Political Dimensions

Democratic leaders, including Joe Morelle and Rosa DeLauro, have voiced strong support for the smithsonian’s independence, calling any effort to fire employees “illegal.” The Smithsonian is governed by a 17-member Board of Regents, which includes members of Congress, the Vice President, and the Chief Justice of the United States.

The controversy surrounding Sajet’s tenure has further complex matters for Bunch, who faces the challenge of navigating presidential power while defending the institution’s autonomy. His own standing remains at some risk, given Trump’s interest in directing matters at the Smithsonian and his aversion to DEI efforts.

The White House has criticized Bunch, citing his past political donations and a book he wrote detailing a museum tour with Trump. The book recounts an exchange where Trump responded to an exhibit on the slave trade by saying, “You know, they love me in the Netherlands.”

Sajet, who previously served as president and chief executive at the Past Society of Pennsylvania, has been defended by museum professionals who argue that her programming at the national Portrait Gallery aligns with efforts to expand the representation of diverse histories.

The White House’s grievances against Sajet focused on her remarks and exhibitions associated with the National Portrait Gallery, including her interest in “outsiders” and the museum’s policy of allocating 50 percent of art spending to diverse artists and portrait subjects.

Trump has also expressed dissatisfaction with his representation in the museum, particularly a photograph with a caption mentioning his impeachments. The wall text notes his comeback in the 2024 election after losing to Joe Biden in 2020.

What are your thoughts on the balance between political influence and the independence of cultural institutions? How can the Smithsonian best navigate these challenges?

share your opinions and insights in the comments below!

Don’t forget to share this article with your friends and colleagues.