After Zhu Yahu came to light on September 27, he admitted that he used staff as fronts for “false political donations and real bribes” and was detained and banned after being sent back yesterday, Zhu Yahu still pleaded guilty to the decision he pointed out that Zhu Yahu did not dispute some of the facts mentioned in the arrest petition, and there are relevant materials in the file that prove the serious suspicion that they have committed the crime of bribing civil servants in breach of their duties under. Article 11, Article 4 and Article 1 of the Crime of Corruption Regulations.

According to our investigation, based on the decision, Zhu Yahu bribed two people, namely Li Wenzong, who was the chairman of the Taipei City Rapid Transit Bureau in 2020 and had the status of “false civil servant ”, and Ke Wenzhe, former mayor of Taipei. 1 of the Corruption Offenses Ordinance.

Zhu Yahu admitted to the case on September 27 that he had bribed Ke Wenzhe 2.1 million yuan on behalf of Shen Qingjing in March 2020 to obtain a guaranteed floor area ratio of 560% for Jinghua City, and the then he asked for a floor area of ​​120,000 square meters so as not to be severely punished, Zhu Yahu can still avoid important issues in the future even if he admits some truths for a short time, so that the right of the Defendant against future review and integrity. In the witness’s testimony, there are enough facts to prove that the accused is in danger of damaging evidence or colluding with observers or witnesses.

Regarding the part in the petition which claimed that the accused Zhu Yahu was a risk of absconding, the judge believed that the information in the file could not really show the accused’s intention to abscond ​​​​or prepare for him in danger of escaping ​​​​just because he had committed a crime and his family members were abroad Yu. In addition, according to the Taiwan Supreme Court defendant’s case record, there is no record of wanting Zhu Yahu, and it is not just a matter of arrest to prevent the accused from escaping is baseless.

The reasons for the decision indicated that attention was paid to the protection of the rights and interests of the accused and the protection of public interests, and that the principle of proportionality in the Constitution was considered in particular, that the Criminal Procedure Law did not have effective prevention provisions on collusion by observers or witnesses, and it was not possible to prevent collusion by supporters or witnesses as Article 1 of the Criminal Procedure Law Article 118 states that bail bond can only be issued when the accused flees to preserve evidence, and after careful consideration, as this case is bribery of a civil servant , which has a wide influence on the national level, and which should be biased towards the protection of public interests, it is confirmed that it cannot be guaranteed. . . Center and it is forbidden to visit it or communicate with it; Zhu Yahu’s lawyer said he will discuss whether to file a complaint with the accused and his family.

★Mirror Weekly reminds you that anyone should be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to the law.

The decision said that after being questioned by the judge, Li Wenzong denied the crimes of corruption and breach of trust mentioned in the petition However, based on the evidence and relevant information in the investigation file, it can be admitted that the accused was involved in Article 4, Item 1, Item 5 of the Corruption Crime Ordinance.

Regarding the reason for his detention, the judge believed that, based on the internal evidence, there are still many doubts about the specific criminal facts involving Li Wenzong that have not yet been clarified by the prosecution’s investigation -accused, and it cannot be excluded that there are still observers or witnesses who are interested in the accused person and who have not reached the case yet. The decision indicated that, to avoid liability, the accused may have taken advantage of the prosecutor’s interest in the case or his influence on the supporter or witness to cooperate agree with the supporter or witness, thus making the case unclear There are enough facts to identify the defendant.

Regarding the need to hold, the decision said, after considering the effective use of national judicial power, the maintenance of social order and public interests, and the extent to which the accused’s private interests in personal liberty and the right to defense are the restriction. , the court believed that the accused Li Wenzong should be detained in any other way According to Article 101, paragraph 2, of the Criminal Procedure Law, Paragraph 3 and Article 105 Item 3 order that the defendant Li Wenzong will be detained and prohibited from visiting, communicating and receiving items.

Li Wenzong is a high school classmate of Ko Wenzhe after serving as the director of Mayor Ko Wenzhe’s office in 2018, he was the chairman of Taipei MRT and other positions when Ke Wenzhe was running for the general election of the Party of the People, Li Wenzong was the chief financial officer and was the chief accountant of Ke While investigating the Ko Wenzhe political donation fraud case, on September 3, Li Wenzong was granted bail of 2 million yuan for crimes such as creating documents under the Criminal Law, and limited overseas travel and electronic monitoring On the 27th, the prosecutor investigated Jinghua City in a bribery case, Li Wenzong was detained for accepting bribes after being interviewed.

★Mirror Weekly reminds you that anyone should be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to the law.