Jordan‘s Focus⁣ on Trump Raises Questions as Thomas Ethics Concerns Go⁤ Unaddressed

WASHINGTON – ⁢While ‍the Senate Judiciary Committee moves to‌ address ethical questions surrounding Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, the house Judiciary Committee,⁣ now led ⁣by Representative Jim Jordan,⁤ has conspicuously shifted its ‍focus to investigations benefiting former President Donald ⁤Trump, prompting criticism that‌ the committee is prioritizing partisan loyalty over its stated role‍ as “the lawyer for the House of Representatives.”

The ⁤contrast⁣ in ⁢approaches‌ comes ⁢as reporting continues to surface regarding financial dealings between Justice Thomas and Harlan Crow, raising concerns‌ about potential conflicts‍ of interest. In response,‍ the Senate ‍Judiciary⁢ Committee announced plans for a hearing “on the need to restore confidence in the Supreme ⁣Court’s ethical standards,” and Senators Sheldon Whitehouse and Representative Hank Johnson have formally requested a referral of Thomas to the Attorney General for potential⁣ violations of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978.

However, the House ⁤January 6 committee’s report identified Jordan‍ as “a⁤ meaningful player in ⁣President Trump’s efforts” to overturn the 2020⁢ election. The report detailed Jordan’s involvement,‍ including ⁣leading a conference call on January 2, 2021, with Trump and other ⁢members of Congress to discuss strategies for‌ delaying the January⁤ 6th joint session. Despite a subpoena, Jordan refused to cooperate with the January 6‍ committee’s investigation.

This history has led to accusations that under Jordan, the⁢ House Judiciary Committee is now‍ functioning as “the lawyer for Donald ⁤J. Trump,” with taxpayers footing the bill for investigations aligned ⁢with the former president’s interests while⁣ legitimate ethical concerns regarding a Supreme court⁢ Justice appear to be⁢ sidelined.

Ohio State Sex Abuse Scandal Exposed in New Documentary

Table of Contents

Ohio State Sex Abuse Scandal Exposed in New Documentary

A new HBO documentary, “Surviving Ohio State,” intensifies scrutiny on the university’s handling of the Dr. Richard Strauss sexual abuse scandal, alleging a cover-up and inequitable settlements with survivors. The film, which premiered at the tribeca film Festival in june 2025, casts a harsh light on events that occurred between 1978 and 1998, raising questions about institutional accountability and victim compensation.

Allegations of Cover-Up and Knowledge Among Coaches

The documentary, produced by George Clooney, features interviews with survivors who recount their experiences of abuse by Dr. Richard Strauss, who was employed by Ohio State from 1978 to 1998. It further alleges that multiple coaches, including former Buckeyes wrestling coach Russ hellickson and U.S.Representative Jim jordan, were aware of Strauss’s actions. Both Hellickson and Jordan, along with members of the Ohio State board of trustees, reportedly declined to be interviewed for the film.

Otte Remenyik, the men’s fencing coach from 1978 to 1999, reported an incident where Strauss allegedly requested a genital exam to treat a student’s bleeding ear. Remenyik stated that her superiors dismissed her report as “rumors and hearsay,” requiring a student to come forward before taking action. Despite Remenyik’s support, no students from the fencing team filed a complaint.

Did You Know? Ohio State settled with 296 survivors for a combined $60 million, averaging about $250,000 per person.

Details of Abuse and Steroid Allegations

The documentary details disturbing accounts from wrestlers, including Dan Ritchie, who described unnecessary genital exams conducted by Strauss without gloves. Some wrestlers reported that Strauss would turn off the lights and use a flashlight during examinations, getting so close that they could feel his breath. Wrestlers also used nicknames for Strauss, such as “Dr. Fun Boy” and “Dr. Jelly Fingers.”

frederick feeney, a wrestling referee from 1988 to 2024, claimed that Strauss masturbated next to him in the shower and grabbed his butt. Feeney reported the incident to Jordan and Hellickson, but Jordan allegedly dismissed it, saying, “It’s Strauss, you know what he does.”

The film also portrays Strauss as an expert on steroids, featuring clips of him discussing steroid use by athletes on “Nightline.” Some interviewees suggested that Ohio State might have been hesitant to discipline Strauss if he was providing steroids to student athletes. One wrestler recalled receiving shots from Strauss before major matches.

Settlement Disparities and Legal Battles

the documentary highlights that the average settlements paid by ohio State to survivors are significantly lower than those in similar sex abuse scandals at other universities. According to the film, Ohio State has paid out around $250,000 per survivor, compared to approximately $1.5 million per survivor in the penn State/Jerry Sandusky case and $1.2 million per settlement in the Michigan state/Dr. Larry Nassar case.

Ohio State’s legal strategy, including an attempt to have lawsuits dismissed due to the statute of limitations, is also criticized in the documentary. The university took its case to the U.S. Supreme court in 2023, but the court declined to review a decision allowing more than 230 men to proceed with their lawsuit. A trial date could be set as early as 2026.

Pro Tip: Understanding the statute of limitations is crucial in sexual abuse cases, as it can significantly impact a survivor’s ability to seek justice.

Reactions and Future Implications

The documentary concludes with former Ohio State leaders apologizing to survivors at a board of trustees meeting. However, former athletes and an attorney argue that the university has not been cooperative behind closed doors. One plaintiff, Snyder-Hill, stated, “I’m a survivor of sexual assault, but I’m a victim of OSU,” criticizing the university’s handling of the scandal.

According to a 2024 study published in the journal *Trauma, Violence, & Abuse*, institutional betrayal, such as the alleged cover-up by Ohio State, can significantly exacerbate the long-term psychological trauma experienced by survivors of sexual abuse Trauma, Violence, & Abuse.

Comparison of Settlement Amounts in University Sex Abuse Scandals
University	Scandal	Average Settlement per Survivor
Ohio State University	Richard Strauss Abuse	$250,000
Penn State University	Jerry Sandusky Abuse	$1,500,000
Michigan State University	Larry Nassar Abuse	$1,200,000

What steps should universities take to prevent and address sexual abuse on campus? How can institutions better support survivors and ensure fair compensation?

evergreen Insights: The Enduring impact of the Ohio State scandal

The Ohio State University sexual abuse scandal involving Dr. Richard Strauss represents a important case study in institutional failure and the long-term consequences of abuse. The scandal has prompted widespread discussion about the responsibilities of universities in protecting students, the importance of timely and thorough investigations, and the need for fair and equitable compensation for survivors.

The case has also highlighted the challenges of overcoming statute of limitations in sexual abuse cases and the importance of creating a safe habitat for survivors to come forward.The ongoing legal battles and public scrutiny surrounding the scandal continue to shape the conversation about accountability and justice in higher education.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Ohio State Sex Abuse Scandal

What is the Ohio State sex abuse scandal about?: The Ohio State sex abuse scandal involves allegations of sexual abuse by Dr. Richard strauss, who worked at the university from 1978 to 1998. Numerous former students have accused Strauss of sexual misconduct, and the university has been criticized for its handling of the allegations.
Who is Dr. Richard Strauss?: Dr. richard Strauss was a physician who worked at ohio State University from 1978 to 1998. He is accused of sexually abusing hundreds of male students during his tenure.
What does the “Surviving Ohio State” documentary reveal?: The “Surviving Ohio State” documentary alleges that Ohio State University covered up the sexual abuse committed by Dr. Richard Strauss and that several coaches and university officials were aware of the abuse. It also examines the settlements offered to survivors, arguing that they are lower compared to similar cases at other universities.
How has Ohio State University responded to the allegations?: Ohio State University has apologized to the survivors of dr. Richard Strauss’s abuse and has reached settlement agreements with many of them. However, the university has also faced criticism for its legal strategies and the amount of compensation offered to survivors.
What is the current status of the lawsuits against Ohio State?: Despite attempts by Ohio State to have the lawsuits dismissed due to the statute of limitations, more than 230 men are allowed to proceed with their lawsuit against the university. A trial date could be set as early as 2026.
How do the settlements in the Ohio State case compare to other university sex abuse scandals?: The average settlement amount in the Ohio State case is significantly lower than those in the Penn State/jerry Sandusky case and the Michigan State/Dr. Larry Nassar case. This disparity is a key point of contention in the “Surviving Ohio State” documentary.

Disclaimer: This article provides data about a legal and sensitive topic. It is indeed not intended to provide legal or medical advice. Consult with qualified professionals for specific guidance.

Share your thoughts on this important issue. What steps can be taken to prevent future abuse and support survivors?

Jim Jordan

Opinion: Why isn’t the House Judiciary Committee looking into red flags about Clarence Thomas?