Skip to content
World Today News
  • Home
  • News
  • World
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Health
  • Technology
World Today News
  • Home
  • News
  • World
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Health
  • Technology
Tuesday, March 10, 2026
World Today News
World Today News
  • Home
  • News
  • World
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Health
  • Technology
Copyright 2021 - All Right Reserved
Home » important issues
Tag:

important issues

Entertainment

Bonesmashing: The Dangerous Looksmaxxing Trend of Hammering Your Face

by Julia Evans – Entertainment Editor February 24, 2026
written by Julia Evans – Entertainment Editor

Braden Peters’ mother took away his hammer when she discovered his unusual self-improvement regimen: repeatedly striking his face in an attempt to reshape his bone structure. Now 20, Peters, known online as Clavicular, continues the practice, bringing the controversial technique of “bonesmashing” into the spotlight as the aesthetics-focused subculture of “looksmaxxing” gains mainstream attention.

Looksmaxxing, a term originating in online spaces with a history of misogyny, centers on the belief that physical appearance dictates success in all aspects of life. Emerging in the early 2010s on forums like PUAHate, SlutHate and Lookism, the ideology has surged in popularity in recent years, particularly on TikTok, fueled by influencers like Clavicular who showcase extreme procedures to a growing audience.

Practices within looksmaxxing generally fall into two categories: “softmaxxing,” encompassing conventional self-care like skincare and exercise, and “hardmaxxing,” involving more invasive interventions such as surgery and hormone injections. Bonesmashing, proponents claim, falls firmly into the latter, aiming to alter facial structure through repeated impact.

The technique involves repeatedly tapping areas like the chin, cheekbones, and jaw with a hammer – or, alternatively, a massage gun. The purported goal is to induce minor bone damage that, as the bone heals, will reshape the face, creating a stronger jawline or more defined features. Looksmaxxers often justify the practice by referencing Wolff’s law, a 19th-century observation that bone adapts and strengthens in response to stress, though medical professionals caution against misinterpreting the principle.

“The very basic premise, that repetitive mechanical load can influence bone density or remodeling, is not completely divorced from science,” says Dr. Joshua Rosenberg, a facial plastic surgeon and Associate Professor of Otolaryngology at Mount Sinai. “It’s just wildly misunderstood and misapplied here.”

While the extent of bonesmashing’s prevalence is challenging to quantify, evidence of the practice exists online. Tutorials are available on YouTube, Instagram users document their progress, and forum members share claims of significant aesthetic improvements, using a rating system known as the PSL scale to measure perceived attractiveness. One user claimed bonesmashing improved their eye area “from SUB 5 to HTN,” signifying a jump from unattractive to “handsome.”

The practice has garnered enough attention to prompt concern within the medical community. At least two letters have been sent to the Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery warning about the spread of bonesmashing on social media. Dr. Ricardo Grillo of Brazil cautioned that the risks include “a range of severe maxillofacial injuries” potentially leading to “cosmetic disfigurement, functional impairment and other potential long-term consequences.”

“Of course, it’s a stupid idea,” Dr. Grillo stated. He outlined numerous risks, including scar tissue formation, vascular and neurological damage, and the potential for facial asymmetry due to uncontrolled trauma. Dr. Rosenberg echoed these concerns, emphasizing the lack of control inherent in the practice. “Hitting your cheeks hard enough could cause a zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture…that results in depression and asymmetry of the cheek, not enhancement.”

Clavicular, born Braden Peters on December 17, 2005, in Hoboken, New Jersey, attended Seton Hall Preparatory School. He has stated that his interest in looksmaxxing stemmed from a desire to gain influence, beginning testosterone injections at age 14 and actively participating in the Looksmax.org forum. His recent controversies include livestreaming an incident involving his Tesla Cybertruck and appearing alongside far-right figures like Andrew Tate and Nick Fuentes, though he has since described himself as apolitical.

February 24, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Entertainment

Trump’s New Inverted Food Pyramid: Protein Push and Dietary Changes

by Julia Evans – Entertainment Editor January 10, 2026
written by Julia Evans – Entertainment Editor

2026/01/10 22:40:13

the Inverted Pyramid:‌ Unpacking the Trump Governance’s⁣ New Dietary Guidelines

What’s beefy, ⁤V-shaped, and suddenly dominating the American diet? It’s the ⁣metaphor for the revamped dietary guidelines unveiled by the Trump administration, featuring an inverted food pyramid that prioritizes protein and dairy. While routine updates to these guidelines occur every‍ five years, this iteration ⁣marks a important departure from​ previous recommendations, sparking debate among nutrition experts.

A Shift Beyond Tweaks: What’s Different ⁣This time?

The latest guidelines aren’t simply⁣ minor adjustments. ⁤They represent‌ a fundamental rethinking of what⁢ constitutes a healthy American ‌diet. While some changes—like emphasizing the reduction of⁣ added sugars and the⁤ avoidance⁤ of highly processed ‍foods—are largely welcomed, the⁤ increased emphasis on‍ protein​ and the reintroduction⁣ of the confusing food pyramid format​ have⁣ raised​ eyebrows.

Impact ⁢on Daily Life & Government Programs

For the average American, these⁣ guidelines‍ may not necessitate drastic‌ lifestyle changes. As Gabby⁢ Headrick, PhD, an assistant professor at the‍ GW⁤ Milken Institute School of Public Health, explains, “The dietary guidelines exist to inform ⁢what a healthy ‍eating pattern should look like for your average healthy⁤ American.” However, the ramifications extend far beyond individual choices. These guidelines directly influence crucial‍ government programs,including school nutrition and ‍the supplemental nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

“They help determine school nutrition‍ programs, as well as nutrition benefits—for example, the SNAP program—and⁣ where dollars get spent in terms of agriculture bills and‍ things like that,” says Dr. Dana‍ Ellis ⁢Hunnes, PhD, MPH, RD, a senior clinical ‌dietitian at UCLA ‌Health. Understanding these broader impacts is ⁢essential, even if individuals don’t actively consult the guidelines themselves.

The Return ⁣of the Pyramid – Upside Down

The original food pyramid, once a staple of nutrition education, was retired over a decade ago due to its inherent complexity.As Dr. ⁣Headrick points out, “When you look at the pyramid, it’s actually ​very challenging ‌to understand.” ‌In 2010, it was replaced​ with the⁤ “MyPlate” graphic, a more straightforward ⁤representation of balanced meal ⁤proportions. Now, the pyramid is back – but with a twist.It’s inverted, placing protein ​and dairy‍ at the apex and relegating grains ⁢to the⁣ base. This unconventional design is already drawing criticism for its potential to confuse⁤ consumers.

The Protein Puzzle: Why the Doubling?

Perhaps the most controversial aspect of the new guidelines is the ​recommendation to double ‍ daily protein intake, from 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight​ to 1.6 grams. This suggestion has baffled many nutritionists,considering most Americans already consume adequate protein⁣ levels.

Dr. Hunnes expressed her surprise, stating, “I was ​a little bit shocked when I‌ saw that. Generally ​speaking, almost any person living in the United States has​ no difficulty getting enough ⁢protein into their diet.” While increased protein intake is ⁢beneficial for athletes and ‌individuals recovering from injury, applying this elevated ⁢standard to the general population seems unwarranted.

Understanding Protein Needs: A Deeper Dive

Protein is vital‌ for building and repairing tissues, ⁤but excessive intake​ doesn’t automatically translate to better health. The Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) of 0.8⁢ grams/kg is sufficient for most ​adults to prevent deficiency. The new guidelines’ 1.6g/kg recommendation aligns more closely with the intake​ levels often seen in bodybuilders or individuals engaged in ​intense physical activity.

Moreover, focusing solely on protein can overshadow the importance ‌of other essential nutrients. A balanced dietary pattern incorporating fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and healthy fats remains paramount for overall well-being. Overemphasis on protein can lead to ‌reduced ⁤consumption of⁢ other vital food groups and⁣ potential health risks ⁤associated‍ with imbalanced⁢ nutrition.⁣ Harvard’s School of⁢ Public health provides extensive resources on understanding optimal protein intake.

Beyond the Headlines: A Critical Examination

The latest dietary guidelines represent a significant and,for⁣ some,concerning shift in nutritional advice. While the intention to improve​ public health is ​commendable, the increased emphasis on⁢ protein and the confusing inverted pyramid raise valid questions. It is crucial to remember that dietary recommendations should be evidence-based and⁣ tailored to individual needs, rather than adhering ‌to sweeping generalizations.

The⁣ decision ‌to prioritize protein might potentially⁤ be influenced by lobbying efforts from the agricultural‌ industry, notably the meat and dairy sectors. ​ It’s essential to consider ⁤potential conflicts of ⁣interest when evaluating ‌these guidelines ⁤and to‍ seek details from ‍autonomous, unbiased sources.

What does‌ this Mean for You?

Despite the headlines, ⁣the core principles of healthy eating remain consistent:⁤ prioritize whole, unprocessed foods, limit added sugars, and maintain a⁣ balanced‌ dietary‍ pattern. Don’t ⁢feel compelled to drastically increase your protein intake unless‌ specifically advised by a healthcare professional. Focus on making lasting, long-term changes⁤ that align with your individual ​needs and preferences.

Future Outlook: ‍Adapting to the New Landscape

The long-term impact of these updated guidelines remains to be seen. It’s likely that ⁤ongoing research and public feedback will shape future iterations. As consumers, it’s crucial to be informed, critical, and proactive in making dietary choices that support ​our health and ‍well-being. By staying informed and consulting with qualified healthcare professionals, we can navigate⁣ the evolving landscape of nutritional advice and prioritize evidence-based eating ⁣habits.

January 10, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Search:

Recent Posts

  • Song Ping, Former Top Chinese Leader, Dies at 109

    March 4, 2026
  • WV High School Wrestling: State Tournament Preview – Cameron, Oak Glen & More

    March 4, 2026
  • Regional & National Football League Selection | France Football Matches

    March 4, 2026
  • Gnocchi Parisienne: Recipe & Wine Pairing for Airy Cheese Dumplings

    March 4, 2026
  • Matsuoka’s Instagram Live Stream Interrupted by Alarm | Gaming Incident

    March 4, 2026

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Accessibility statement
  • California Privacy Notice (CCPA/CPRA)
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA Policy
  • Do not sell my info
  • EDITORIAL TEAM
  • Terms & Conditions

@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: contact@world-today-news.com


Back To Top
World Today News
  • Home
  • News
  • World
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Health
  • Technology
World Today News
  • Home
  • News
  • World
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Health
  • Technology
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: contact@world-today-news.com