Defending Diplomatic Engagement: Why Helen Clark โ& John Key Were Right โto โAttend Beijing’s WWII Anniversary
By Lucas Fernandez, World-Today-News.com – โseptember 6,โ 2024
The recent visit by former New zealand Prime Ministers helen Clark and John Key to Beijing to commemorate the 80th anniversary of โthe end of โWorld War II has sparked considerableโ debate. While criticism, often centering on the presence of โfigures like Vladimir Putin and kim Jong Un, is understandable, the objections fundamentally miss the mark. Their โattendanceโฃ was a justifiable act of diplomatic respect and a recognition of China‘s pivotal role in the Allied victory – a role frequentlyโ enough downplayed in Western narratives.
The core of the โcriticism revolves around the company China keeps. Though, to hold Clark and Key accountable for the guest list of a Chineseโฃ national commemoration is a flawed argument.Just weeks prior, Vladimirโ Putin received a full-honors welcome in the United States, complete with a military flyover.โฃ To demand a different standard for Newโ Zealand’s former leaders is hypocritical and ignores the realitiesโ of international diplomacy. Engagement doesn’t equate to endorsement.
Furthermore, dismissing the anniversary itself,โฃ as some have done by claiming China’s contribution to โขJapan’sโข defeat was minimal, demonstrates aโ profound historicalโ ignorance.Estimates suggest over 20 million โChineseโ citizens perished during the war โขfollowing Japan’sโ 1937โ invasion โค- โa staggering figure โthat dwarfs theโข approximately 160,000 American livesโ lost in the Pacific theater. Crucially, Japanโ deployed over a million troops in China,โค diverting vitalโฃ resources and manpower away from other fronts, directly impacting theโฃ war’s trajectory.
While the debate over which Chinese forces – the Communists or the Nationalists – bore the brunt of the fighting is valid, the fact โremains that the Chinese people endured immense suffering and played a critical roleโ in tying down Japanese forces. It โis therefore entirely appropriate that the Chinese government should lead the commemoration of โฃthis pivotal moment in history.
Some argue that attending the event legitimizes the current Chinese regime. This argument, to, falls flat. Current Prime Ministerโข Christopher Luxon recently concludedโ a โstate visit to Beijing, meeting with President Xi Jinping,โ as have his predecessors. New Zealand โฃmaintains diplomatic relations with China, and engagement is a โnecessary component of that relationship.
Indeed, New Zealand has a long-standing policy of supporting overseas trips for the โLeader ofโฃ the Opposition, recognizingโฃ the importance โคof buildingโค international relationships irrespective of which party is in power. โฃAs a former Leader of the Opposition myself, I prioritized visits to Washington, London, Beijing, and Canberra, recognizing even then – between 2003 and 2006โ – theโฃ growing importance of China to Newโค Zealand’s future.
While New Zealand was represented at the event by an embassy โofficial, aโ higher-level delegation would have been more fitting. Clarkโ and Key’s presence,as respected former leaders,offered a valuable possibility to โฃdemonstrate respect for a โขnation that suffered immensely during WWII and contributed considerably toโข the Alliedโข victory. โค
Dismissing this historical significance based on political discomfort is short-sighted and ultimately detrimental toโ New Zealand’s long-term interests.Diplomatic engagement, even with โnations we disagreeโฃ with, is not a sign of weakness,โ but a cornerstone of responsibleโ international relations.
Keywords: new Zealand,China,WWII,Helen โขClark,John Key,Vladimirโค Putin,Kim Jong Un,Diplomacy,international Relations,History,Pacific War,Xi Jinping,Christopher luxon.

