Push for ‘Fitness as a Vital Sign’ Gains Momentum, But Practicality Questions Remain
WASHINGTON – A growing movement to incorporate physical fitness metrics as a standard vital sign alongside blood pressure and heart rate is gaining traction within the Biden governance, aiming to shift the focus of healthcare towards preventative measures. The initiative, spearheaded by the Medical-Home Health Assessment (MAHA) working group, proposes routinely assessing factors like cardiorespiratory health and muscular strength, potentially revolutionizing how doctors evaluate overall patient wellbeing.
The concept builds on decades-old fitness assessments,like the Presidential Fitness Test initiated by President Kennedy in the 1960s and later modified by President Obama,which measured schoolchildren’s abilities in areas like the mile run,situps,pushups,and rope climbs. Now, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Department of Education are collaborating with the President’s Council on Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition to explore reintroducing similar assessments within schools and potentially integrating them into broader public health strategies. Though, experts are debating the practicality and effectiveness of standardized fitness tests, questioning whether a one-size-fits-all approach can truly gauge individual health risks and motivate positive change.
The MAHA proposal comes as healthcare professionals increasingly recognize the critical link between physical activity and chronic disease prevention. Proponents argue that routinely measuring fitness levels could identify individuals at risk for conditions like heart disease, diabetes, and certain cancers, allowing for earlier intervention and personalized treatment plans. Key metrics under consideration include heart rate recovery – tracking how quickly the heart rate returns to normal after exercise – and also assessments of strength, flexibility, and endurance.”To me the best approach is always treating each person individually to figure out how I can definitely help them be the best version of themselves,” said Dr. Hershenson, a physician involved in the discussion. “That’s exceptionally difficult when you’re making massive public policy for however many millions of people, but I think it’s going to be different for everybody.”
While acknowledging the value of establishing a baseline, Hershenson expressed skepticism about the utility of metrics like pull-up counts in accurately reflecting overall fitness. “I think it’s useful to have some sort of baseline. But you need to know what to do with that,” he stated. “We’re not just gonna throw a ball around. Let’s find ways that we can improve this person’s strength and this person’s fitness by doing stuff that’s fun.”
The initiative faces challenges in implementation,including determining appropriate assessment methods,addressing barriers to exercise,and ensuring equitable access to fitness resources. Questions remain about whether the focus should be on quantifiable metrics like steps taken or heart rate recovery, or more complete evaluations tailored to individual needs. “Is it a questionnaire? Is it measuring heart rate recovery? Is it measuring how many steps you take?” Hershenson asked.”It’s probably not going to be perfect.”
STAT’s coverage of chronic health issues is supported by a grant from Bloomberg Philanthropies.Our financial supporters are not involved in any decisions about our journalism.
