A grandmother in Zhejiang, China was taking her grandson out recently, and happened to meet her neighbor next door, but the neighbor suddenly said, “The child is not like his father.” After taking her son and grandson for a paternity test, she found out that she was not her own. (Schematic/Pixabay)
When a grandmother in Zhejiang, China was taking her grandson out recently, she happened to run into a neighbor next door, but the neighbor suddenly said, “The child is not like his father.” Because of this sentence, she was alerted, and immediately asked her son to take her grandson for a paternity test. Unexpectedly, it was not her own, which made her dumbfounded and said, “The wife is gone, the money is gone, and the house is gone.”
According to a “Star Video” report, A Jian (pseudonym), a man from Pujiang, Zhejiang, China, and A Suo (pseudonym) decided to get married after falling in love. However, before marriage, Ah Jian was mentally ill due to a car accident, and was recognized as a third-level mental disability. His guardian was his mother. Afterwards, Ah Suo still married her and gave birth to his son Xiaoyang (pseudonym) the following year.
Not long after Xiao Yang was born, Ah Suo sued for divorce. The two parties agreed that Xiao Yang would be raised by Ah Suo, and Ah Jian would have to pay child support every month until Xiao Yang came of age. The property purchased by both parties during their marriage is owned by Xiaoyang, and Ah Suo enjoys the right of permanent residence, and a car is also owned by Ah Suo.
Later, when Jian’s mother took her grandson out, relatives and neighbors said that “the child is not like his father”. Therefore, Jian’s mother was awakened and took her son and grandson to do a paternity test. Unexpectedly, Jian was not the grandson’s biological father.After the incident was exposed, Ah Jian’s mother said that “the wife is gone, the money is gone, and the house is gone.” After that, she asked the Pujiang County Court for a retrial
The follow-up Pujiang County Court also adopted the retrial suggestion and started the retrial procedure. The real estate and vehicles purchased during the relationship between Ah Jian and Ah Suo were reasonably distributed according to the total amount of common property. In the end, the court ruled that A Suo should pay A Jian a property division fee of 680,000 yuan (approximately NT$2.9 million).
#grandson #neighbors #wake #word #Grandmas #DNA #test #born #dumb #International #CTWANT
2023-06-15 05:43:15
