Amazon, one of the world’s largest online shopping platforms, recently banned the sale of Flipper Zero, a multi-purpose hacking device, on its website. The decision came after Amazon claimed that the Flipper Zero violated its policy against card skimming devices. While Flipper Zero’s creators insist that their product is simply a tool for hacking and security testing, Amazon’s ban has raised questions about the ethics of selling such devices and the responsibilities of e-commerce platforms to regulate their sale. In this article, we will explore the Flipper Zero device, why Amazon banned its sale, and the larger implications of this decision on the sale of hacking tools and security devices.
Amazon has prohibited the sale of Flipper Zero, a versatile pen-testing tool, on its platform due to its potential use in card-skimming. The device, which went viral on TikTok last year, can be used for various tasks such as intercepting Bluetooth signals, unlocking car doors, altering gas station price signs, and gaining access to computers. The device’s co-creator, Alex Kulagin, stated that Flipper Zero was created for educational purposes and hobbyists’ entertainment. Although Amazon has removed Flipper Zero from its site, it can still be purchased directly from the company’s site for $169. Kulagin emphasized that Flipper does have the potential to become a threat but it is not intended to break any laws.
In conclusion, Amazon’s recent ban on the Flipper Zero serves as a reminder of their strict policies on the sale of products that can be used for illegal activities. While the Flipper Zero was touted as a security tool for ethical hacking and security testing, Amazon’s decision to ban the device underscores the importance of ensuring that any device purchased online abides by the platform’s guidelines. As technology continues to evolve in new and innovative ways, it remains crucial for e-commerce platforms to remain vigilant and adapt their policies accordingly to ensure the safety and privacy of their users.
Gizmodo
“Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power” TV Series Loses Majority of Viewers According to New Report
When it comes to epic fantasy, few franchises loom larger in popular imagination than The Lord of the Rings. First as a legendary trilogy of novels by J.R.R. Tolkien, and then as a groundbreaking film series, Peter Jackson’s adaptation of the sprawling story is nothing short of a cultural phenomenon. However, with the recent announcement of Amazon’s forthcoming Lord of the Rings TV series, fans are wondering whether they need a refresher course on Middle-earth lore. But what if you never finished the original series? Are you really prepared for the potential in-depth prequel? Here, we explore the reasons you may have missed out on completing your viewing of The Lord of the Rings, and why it’s time to rectify that mistake.
Amazon Studios recently boasted about the premiere of the much-awaited “Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power” TV series, which reportedly had 25 million viewers worldwide on the day it aired. But when the first season ended, a large number of viewers had already given up on the show.
An analysis by the Hollywood Reporter revealed that only 37% of “Rings of Power” viewers in the US stuck around through the Prime Video series’ eighth episode. Meanwhile, 55% of international viewers abandoned it along the way. “A 50% completion rate would be a solid but not spectacular result, according to insiders,” stated the report.
This is quite surprising considering Amazon paid half a billion dollars for the show and had already ordered a second season before the premiere of the first episode. The decline in viewership is massive and can be quite concerning for a show of this scale.
While the series was an undeniable visual treat, the pacing of the story left viewers waiting, and character introductions seemed delayed, causing frustration for some. The titular rings weren’t even shown until the season finale.
What does this imply for Amazon’s “Rings of Power” future? Will viewers give it another chance? Will it gain more popularity in the future? Only time will tell.
On a side note, if you’re a fan of sci-fi, fantasy and superhero genres, io9 is the website where you can find all the latest updates. Check out their news on the Marvel, Star Wars and Star Trek releases, the future of Doctor Who, and everything you need to know about the DC Universe on film and TV.
We hope this article has given you a better understanding of why it’s okay to not finish watching The Lord of the Rings TV show. While it’s certainly a fantastic franchise, not everyone has the time, energy, or interest to sit through hours and hours of content. Whether it’s because you prefer the books, or simply have other entertainment priorities, there is nothing wrong with not finishing the series. As long as you enjoyed the time you did spend watching it, that’s all that really matters. So go ahead and let any feelings of guilt or FOMO fade away, and feel confident in your decision to move on to different things. Life is too short to force yourself to watch something you no longer enjoy.
New Claims Intensify the Controversy Surrounding Victoria Alonso’s Firing from Marvel.
The firing of Victoria Alonso, the top executive at Marvel Studios, has been the talk of the entertainment industry for weeks. Now, the saga has taken a new twist with fresh claims coming to light. The situation has continued to escalate and raise more questions about the reasoning behind the decision to terminate Alonso’s employment. In this article, we will explore the latest development in the Victoria Alonso Marvel firing saga, share the new claims that are causing a stir, and provide insights on what this could mean for the future of Marvel Studios.
When Victoria Alonso was unexpectedly fired from Marvel Studios, it immediately sparked questions and rumors within the entertainment industry. As the producer for every single Marvel Studios movie alongside Kevin Feige and Louis D’Esposito, Alonso’s departure from the company felt like a major loss for the MCU.
Initially, the reason for her termination was not revealed, but rumors began to emerge later that week. The Hollywood Reporter published an article stating that Alonso was fired because she breached her contract by producing Argentina, 1985, a movie distributed by Amazon that was nominated for the Best International Feature Oscar. According to the trade, working with a competing company and project was a key factor behind her firing.
However, Alonso’s lawyer Patty Glaser told the Los Angeles Times that the claims were false. Glaser argued that “The idea that Victoria was fired over a handful of press interviews relating to a personal passion project about human rights and democracy that was nominated for an Oscar and which she got Disney’s blessing to work on is absolutely ridiculous.” She further added that Alonso “was terminated when she refused to do something she believed was reprehensible.” Glaser did not provide further details on this point but added that “Disney and Marvel made a really poor decision that will have serious consequences.”
The situation escalated further when a Disney spokesperson responded to Glaser’s claims, stating that Alonso’s departure was due to an “indisputable breach of contract and a direct violation of company policy.” The representative also mentioned that Alonso had made a significant contribution to the studio and wished her well for the future.
The question on everyone’s mind now is what happens next? Alonso has a memoir coming out later this year called Possibility Is Your Superpower, which will share her story of growing up in Argentina and rising through the ranks to become one of the most important figures at Marvel Studios. There is a possibility that she may also choose to speak out on the details of her departure from the company in an upcoming forum or legal proceeding.
The situation surrounding Alonso’s firing is reminiscent of past interconnectivity sagas within the MCU. It is difficult to say which direction this story will take, but it is certain that fans will continue to stay tuned for further developments.
As the saga of Victoria Alonso’s firing from Marvel heats up with new claims, it’s clear that this story is far from over. With accusations flying back and forth, it’s impossible to know the full truth of what happened behind closed doors. However, one thing is certain: Alonso’s departure has sparked a fiercely divided debate about the state of diversity and representation in the entertainment industry. Whether or not Alonso was treated unfairly may never be fully resolved, but this controversy has brought to light important questions about who gets to make decisions in Hollywood and whose stories are given a platform. As we continue to follow this story, let’s hope that it leads to a more inclusive and equitable future for everyone in the industry.
NASA Seeks Funding for Deorbiting ISS ‘Space Tug’ with Bold Plans
NASA’s latest request for cash is making headlines for its big plans for a deorbiting ISS ‘space tug.’ The space agency has recently submitted its fiscal year 2022 budget request, asking for $24.7 billion to fund various projects, including the development of the new space tug. NASA has been working on the conceptualization of this vehicle for some time now, and the latest budget request shows that it is ready to take the project to the next level. The space tug would be tasked with moving modules and even the entire International Space Station (ISS) out of orbit when its life span is up. This is an important development for the space agency as it prepares for a future that includes commercial space travel and the potential for more debris in orbit. Let’s take a closer look at the details of this exciting proposal.
NASA has revealed its proposed budget for 2024, which includes staying dedicated to the Artemis lunar program, its Moon to Mars objectives, and sustaining a presence in low Earth orbit. The space agency is additionally seeking a space tug to deorbit the International Space Station at the end of its life. NASA has allocated $180 million for the development of a deorbit ability for the ISS, defining that it will call upon the private sector to create a space tug concept to lower the orbit of the station, and to re-enter and burn up through the Earth’s atmosphere. NASA’s Chief Financial Officer Margaret Vo Schaus has highlighted the key priorities for the budget, which include establishing a presence on and around the Moon, developing a new plan to deorbit the ISS, and starting to launch samples from the surface of Mars as early as 2030. Lueders estimates that the total cost of the space tug would be approximately $1 billion, with the requested $180 million designed to provide a start on the project in the coming year.
In conclusion, NASA’s latest request for funding includes some exciting plans for the future of space exploration. With the deorbiting ISS space tug, we can look forward to more efficient and cost-effective ways to maintain and dispose of satellites and space debris. This technology could have significant implications for the future of space travel and exploration. As we continue to push the boundaries of what is possible in space, we can trust that NASA will always be at the forefront of innovation and discovery. The future of space is bright, and we can’t wait to see what lies ahead.