Skip to content
World Today News
  • Home
  • News
  • World
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Health
  • Technology
World Today News
  • Home
  • News
  • World
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Health
  • Technology
Friday, March 6, 2026
World Today News
World Today News
  • Home
  • News
  • World
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Health
  • Technology
Copyright 2021 - All Right Reserved
Home » EV charging
Tag:

EV charging

Business

AI & the Return of DC Power: Rewriting the Current Wars

by Priya Shah – Business Editor February 26, 2026
written by Priya Shah – Business Editor

FORT WORTH, TEXAS – Rows of servers at Meta’s Fort Worth Data Center, like those at facilities across the globe, are driving a quiet revolution in how electricity is delivered. The surging demand for power from artificial intelligence data centers and, increasingly, electric vehicles is challenging the existing power grid, an architecture largely unchanged since the “Current Wars” of the late 19th century. But a potential solution lies in revisiting a technology championed by Thomas Edison: direct current (DC) electricity.

The current grid relies on alternating current (AC), which allows electricity to travel long distances via transformers. This system, favored by Edison’s rival George Westinghouse, won out in the early 20th century. However, the rise of digital devices – each converting AC to DC – created a constant, unseen cycle of energy conversion. Now, the explosive growth of AI is intensifying this inefficiency.

“Demand is crazy everywhere,” said Phoebe Bernet, an associate at real estate firm CBRE, speaking specifically about the Dallas-Fort Worth area, which ranks second behind Northern Virginia for data center growth. According to a CBRE report, data center space under construction in Dallas-Fort Worth totaled 472.1 megawatts in the first half of 2024, a nearly 73% increase year-over-year, with 94.5% of that space already leased. This rapid expansion is straining local energy and water resources.

Inside data centers, electricity is repeatedly converted between AC and DC before reaching the servers that require DC power. Each conversion wastes energy and generates heat. Hyperscalers like Google and Microsoft, focused on maximizing efficiency, are increasingly turning to on-site solar and battery storage – both DC sources – to bypass the inefficiencies of the AC grid.

AI companies, including Nvidia, are actively pushing the power industry towards a high-voltage DC infrastructure. Both established energy suppliers and novel startups are investing in the development of this DC-native world. Meta’s Fort Worth Data Center, a 170-acre campus spanning over 2.5 million square feet, exemplifies this trend, focusing on efficiency and sustainability, and supporting renewable energy projects in Texas to meet its 100% clean and renewable energy goal.

The shift towards DC isn’t entirely new. DC has long been used in specialized applications like railways, telegraphs, and off-grid systems. The simplicity and efficiency of DC have made it a natural choice for remote locations and mobile applications like RVs and sailboats.

Even as the grid won’t entirely abandon AC, the future of electrification may increasingly rely on DC. After more than a century, direct current is poised to become the dominant force in the AI age, mirroring the vision of Thomas Edison and potentially rewriting the outcome of the Current Wars.

February 26, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Business

Tesla Loses Appeal in Charge Fusion EV Charger Patent Dispute at CAFC

by Priya Shah – Business Editor February 25, 2026
written by Priya Shah – Business Editor

A split panel decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Wednesday upheld a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ruling, siding with Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC in its patent dispute with Tesla Inc. The ruling affirms the validity of Charge Fusion’s electric vehicle (EV) charging patent, U.S. Patent No. 10,998,753, titled “Systems and Methods for Charging Electric Vehicles.”

Tesla had challenged the patent through an inter partes review (IPR) filed in October 2024, arguing the claims lacked novelty and were obvious in light of prior art. The PTAB instituted the review but ultimately determined Tesla had not demonstrated the patent claims were unpatentable. Tesla appealed that decision to the Federal Circuit.

The core of the dispute centered on the interpretation of the “Charging Control Limitation” within the patent. Tesla contended that a prior art reference, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0243331 (referred to as “Kato”), demonstrated the charging control mechanism was already known. Specifically, Tesla argued that Kato disclosed a system where a user manually plugging in a vehicle at scheduled charging locations constituted sufficient control.

However, both the PTAB and the Federal Circuit majority agreed that the “plain and ordinary meaning” of the Charging Control Limitation excludes manual user intervention. The court found the patent’s claims require an automated system, not one reliant on a user initiating and terminating charging sessions. The court’s opinion stated the patent specification “discloses embodiments where the charging system itself ‘intelligently’ charges vehicles by conducting the charging process in accordance with a charging schedule.”

Judge Chen authored the majority opinion, joined by Judge Reyna. The court emphasized that the patent’s specification further supports an automated process, referencing interactions with wireless charging locations and “intelligent charging management” that goes beyond simple manual plug-in operation.

Judge Dyk dissented, arguing that Kato did disclose the Charging Control limitation under a reasonable construction, and that the claim language did not explicitly require “intelligent charging.”

The decision comes as patent litigation in the EV sector intensifies, with companies increasingly relying on intellectual property protection to secure their positions in the rapidly evolving market. According to legal news sources, this ruling could set a precedent for future disputes and encourage greater investment in patent portfolios within the EV technology space. The case highlights the complexities of navigating patent challenges in the high-tech industry, where nuanced interpretations of claim language and prior art can have significant consequences.

The Federal Circuit’s affirmation of the PTAB’s decision means Charge Fusion Technologies’ patent remains in force, potentially impacting Tesla and other companies involved in EV charging technology. No further appeals are currently scheduled, leaving the patent’s validity unchallenged.

February 25, 2026 0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Search:

Recent Posts

  • Song Ping, Former Top Chinese Leader, Dies at 109

    March 4, 2026
  • WV High School Wrestling: State Tournament Preview – Cameron, Oak Glen & More

    March 4, 2026
  • Regional & National Football League Selection | France Football Matches

    March 4, 2026
  • Gnocchi Parisienne: Recipe & Wine Pairing for Airy Cheese Dumplings

    March 4, 2026
  • Matsuoka’s Instagram Live Stream Interrupted by Alarm | Gaming Incident

    March 4, 2026

Follow Me

Follow Me
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Accessibility statement
  • California Privacy Notice (CCPA/CPRA)
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • DMCA Policy
  • Do not sell my info
  • EDITORIAL TEAM
  • Terms & Conditions

@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: contact@world-today-news.com


Back To Top
World Today News
  • Home
  • News
  • World
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Health
  • Technology
World Today News
  • Home
  • News
  • World
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Business
  • Health
  • Technology
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by Byohosting – Most Recommended Web Hosting – for complains, abuse, advertising contact: contact@world-today-news.com