Belgium‘s Asylum System Under Strain: dutch Court Halts Returns of Male Asylum Seekers
Table of Contents
Brussels – A recent ruling by the Netherlands’ highest court has brought renewed scrutiny to Belgium’s capacity to provide adequate shelter for asylum seekers, specifically single men. The court steadfast that returning male asylum seekers to Belgium is currently untenable due to insufficient housing and concerns over human rights standards. This decision underscores a growing crisis in Belgium’s asylum system, where manny applicants are left without accommodation.
The Reality for Male Asylum Seekers
each weekday morning, individuals newly arrived in Belgium register for asylum at a center in Brussels. A segregated system exists,with separate lines for women,children,and families,and another for single men. While all applicants can submit their claims, lodging is not guaranteed.
For a prolonged period, Belgium has been unable to offer housing to single men due to capacity limitations. Following application submission,these men are often immediately released without any overnight accommodation.
Did You Know? Belgium’s asylum process, while legally compliant, has faced criticism for its practical implementation, notably regarding the provision of basic necessities like shelter.
A Handout and the Street
According to Thomas Willekens of Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen (Flemish Refugee Work), applicants receive a leaflet stating, “Due to the saturation of the reception network, Fedasil is currently unable to guarantee accommodation to everyone. You can submit yoru asylum application,after which you will be guided to the exit.” This is the extent of the information provided by the Belgian government, Willekens explained. ”After that, it is up to NGOs to provide assistance – we try to help people with a lawyer, clothing, and food.”
“No Country Wants Us”
The Belgian government maintains that its 35,000 available reception places are fully occupied, prioritizing women and children. Approximately 1,800 single men are currently without access to shelter.
“I have nowhere to sleep and sleep on the street,” stated an asylum seeker from Egypt, speaking alongside a friend outside the registration center. “I just want to apply for asylum,” one of the men added. “I am tired. I have been to many countries, and no country wants us.”
sleeping Rough
Audrian and Naveen, also seeking refuge in Belgium, visited Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen to explore their options for accommodation. “If I have money, I sleep in a hostel, and if the weather is good, I sleep outside,” said Audrian, who has been in Brussels for several weeks after fleeing Cameroon.
Naveen,recently arrived after spending time in Greece,reported being denied Belgian shelter due to having previously applied for asylum in Greece.
Pro Tip: Asylum seekers facing difficulties finding accommodation should immediately contact NGOs like Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen for assistance and guidance.
Stable Asylum Application Numbers
Willekens notes that most refugees are aware of the lack of accommodation. “When the men arrive here, I think they are already aware of the lack of reception places. And yet they apply for asylum, knowing they will have to sleep on the street for three to four months.”
Data from aid organizations indicates no significant decrease in asylum applications in Belgium. “The number of arrivals remains fairly stable month after month,” said Tom Devriendt of Caritas. “We are talking about around 3,000 per month. That was the case last year, and two years ago as well.”
A Deterrent Effect?
Devriendt refrained from making definitive statements about the intent of the reception policy but suggested,”It seems likely that the policy is intended to have a deterrent effect. You won’t hear that from the Minister of Asylum and Migration, but we cannot shake the impression that this fits within the strictest migration policy ever, which the current government wants to profile itself with.”
The dutch Council of State described the situation as a “system failure” and a “certain form of indifference on the part of the Belgian government.”
“This is a Policy Choice”
“I think the term ‘system failure’ hides something,” Devriendt explained. ”Namely, that this is not about a failure of the system. This is about a policy choice: ‘We have 35,000 reception places, and we are not going to create any more.’ Last year there were still 38,000 reception places, and 10 years ago even more.”
“It is a painful realization that as Belgians, we are failing to give people what they are entitled to,” the aid worker lamented.
Broader European implications?
The situation in Belgium prompted the Dutch court’s decision to prohibit returns. Whether other countries will follow suit remains to be seen. “We will have to see what the effect is,” Devriendt said. “It truly seems not unlikely. Whether other neighboring countries such as France,Germany,or England will also shift,we will have to see.”
He also highlighted the risk of a domino effect from the Belgian situation: “If several countries limit their reception for certain groups, that could have consequences for the entire European system.” Asylum seekers share this concern. “We really hope that Belgium, as a country of human rights, will continue to set a good example,” said Audrian from Cameroon. “Because if Belgium does not, I am afraid that other countries will also fall into extremes. That is one of my fears.”
| Key Metric | Data (as of November 2023) |
|---|---|
| Total Reception Places in Belgium | 35,000 |
| Estimated Asylum Seekers Without accommodation | ~1,800 (single men) |
| Average Monthly Asylum Applications | ~3,000 |
| Priority Groups for Accommodation | Women, Children, and Families |
The European Union’s Common European Asylum System (European Commission) aims to harmonize asylum procedures and standards across member states,but implementation varies considerably. The Dublin Regulation,a key component,determines which member state is responsible for examining an asylum claim,frequently enough leading to challenges and burdens on frontline states like Belgium.
Context and Trends
The strain on Belgium’s asylum system is part of a broader European trend of increasing migration flows and challenges in accommodating asylum seekers. Factors driving migration include conflict, persecution, poverty, and climate change. The debate over burden-sharing among EU member states remains a contentious issue, with some countries advocating for more solidarity and others prioritizing border control. the long-term implications of the Dutch court ruling could reshape asylum policies across the region, potentially leading to increased pressure on other EU nations.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is the current situation for asylum seekers in Belgium? Many single male asylum seekers are currently being denied accommodation upon arrival.
- Why did the Dutch court halt returns to Belgium? The court cited insufficient housing and concerns about human rights standards.
- How many asylum seekers are affected by the lack of accommodation? Approximately 1,800 single men are currently without shelter.
- What is Belgium doing to address the crisis? The government maintains existing capacity and prioritizes vulnerable groups.
- What can asylum seekers do if they are denied accommodation? Seek assistance from NGOs like Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen.
What are your thoughts on the challenges facing Belgium’s asylum system? Do you believe a more equitable distribution of responsibility is needed across Europe?
We encourage you to share this article with your network and join the conversation. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on global affairs and humanitarian issues.