complaints

The state purchase of the Federal Public Institution “Rosdormonitoring” for 210 million rubles for the development of software for the road pressure control point was stopped by two complaints. The name of the winning company is not known.

210 million for weighing heavy trucks

On July 16, 2024, the federal government institute “Center for Monitoring the Safe Operation of Highways of the Federal Road Agency” (FKU “Rosdormonitoring”) placed a request for 210,073.5 thousand rubles on the government procurement website. for software development for automatic point of weight and volume control (APVGK).

On August 1, 2024, two complaints were received regarding the purchase: from a celebrity a telecommunications company “Vympel-Communications”, the owner of the trademark “Beeline”, as well as the company “Softline Projects”. For this reason, the provider’s decision was postponed on August 5, 2024. However, already on August 6, 2024 on the page government procurement a protocol summarizing the identification of a supplier was posted, and on the same day the supply was automatically transferred to the stage “Supplier verification completed” related to the protocol setting completing the work of the commission .

Currently, the public procurement of the Federal Institute “Rosdormonitoring” has two statuses – “The identification of the supplier is completed” and “The identification of the supplier (contractor, performer) is suspended due to a complaint.”

Unknown participant and winner

The purpose of the procurement was to provide development services information system “Automatic system” Monitoring the intensity and composition of traffic flow in relation to vehicles carrying large and (or) heavy goods at stationary weight control points located on federal roads Russian Federation» regarding the development of an intelligent model to recognize state registration numbers and create a personal account for the owner of an automatic weight and volume control point (APVGK).

The supplier was asked to provide services for the design and development of information technologies for application and software testing activities.

The auction was declared invalid according to clause 1, part 1 of Article 52 “Recognition of the open competitive method as invalid. Consequences of such recognition” of Law No. 44-FZ “On the contract system in the field of supply of goods, works, services to ensure state and municipal needs” – because after the deadline for submission of applications, only one application for participation in the procurement was submitted.

According to the entry on the page in the section “Results of identifying a supplier (contractor, player), created on the basis of posted protocols,” in the column “Partners with whom a contract is expected to conclude,” the identification number of the sole participant and winner of the electronic auction is indicated, but the name of the company remains unknown.

The essence of the claims of both companies

In the complaint from PJSC”Vympel-Communication“There are four points. According to them, the customer government procurement the entry of software originating from foreign countries is not prohibited; the maximum values ​​for the importance of the criteria for the evaluation of applications were illegally established; the mandatory form of a standard contract has not been applied, and the description of the supply item does not contain the necessary information and features.

Space VDI: An innovative solution for desktop virtualization

Market

In turn, LLCProject Softline» has filed a complaint against the provisions of the public procurement notice. First, the authors of the complaint believe that the customer incorrectly set the threshold values ​​for the importance of the criteria for evaluating applications for participation in the supply of goods, works and services to meet state and municipal needs . Secondly, they complain that only contracts are accepted for the development, implementation, maintenance and updating of software related to travel booking systems. vehiclesincluding products and the definition of their parameters, unreasonably limiting the number of participants by narrowing the concept of the “relative subject of the contract”.

According to the opinionRosavtodor“, a group that represents the interests of FKU “Rosdormonitoring”, in response to a request from CNews, a decision is still awaited FAS Russia on this subject. “And it depends on the decision of this task force that other actions regarding designated public procurement (including the verification of the supplier as a whole) will be responsible,” explained the representative of Rosavtodor the situation. Beeline declined to comment on the situation. A request for comment from Softline Projects remains unanswered.