bharada and

Jakarta –

Freddy Sambo he confessed that he cleaned Yosua’s HS-type pistol using the cloth mask he used. This was done to remove his fingerprints on Joshua’s gun.

This was disclosed when Ferdy Sambo was being examined as a defendant in Brigadier Yosua’s murder trial at South Jakarta (Jaksel) District Court on Tuesday (10/1/2023). Initially, the team of legal counsel questioned the findings of the appraisers’ examination who said there were no Sambo prints on Yosua’s gun.

While Sambo previously revealed to have taken the gun from Joshua’s waist after he fell to his death. Later, Sambo claimed that he used the weapon to shoot the wall there so that it would appear that a shooting had occurred.

“I’m kind of involved in the shooting incident, when the late Joshua collapsed, then first you explained that you took the revolver that was on Joshua’s right waist, then you fired into the wall. But yesterday at expert testimony “DNA, the gun didn’t find your fingerprints or your DNA. Brother what do you do with the gun when you’re done shooting?” asked the counsel in the courtroom, Tuesday (10/1/2023).

That’s when Sambo he confessed that he used his mask to clean Yosua’s HS weapon to get rid of his fingerprints. After that, Sambo continued, the gun was then held in Joshua’s hands to smooth out the scenario he was creating.

“I said after the shooting I wiped it off with my cloth mask and then I also took Joshua’s hand to shoot the back wall,” Sambo said.

“Your goal is to confirm the shooting scenario?” the legal counsel asked later.

“It seems so,” Sambo replied.

Sambo said the mask would not become evidence in the case because Sambo himself had thrown it away.

“Earlier, the defendant explained that he was brushed with a mask, was the mask used as evidence in this case, or did you throw it away?” the counsel asked.

“I threw it away,” Sambo said.

The prosecution of Ferdy Sambo

In this case, Ferdy Sambo was charged with the premeditated murder of Brigadier Yosua Hutabarat. This act was performed alongside Putri Candrawathi, Richard Eliezer, Ricky Rizal Wibowo and Strong Ma’ruf.

Ferdy Sambo and other defendants were tried under article 340 of the penal code subordinate to article 338 of the penal code junco Art. 55 paragraph 1 1 Criminal Code

Ferdy Sambo was also accused of obstructing the investigation into the Yosua murder case. Ferdy Sambo was accused of the law n. 19 of 2016 amending the law n. 11 of 2008 regarding electronic information and transactions and the penal code.

Watch the video ‘Sambo claims he has the courage to fight Joshua alone, but takes advantage of Ricky’:

[Gambas:Video 20detik]

(wnv/dwia)

Father Franz Magnis Suseno SJ spoke of factors that could reduce the sentence for Bharada Richard Eliezer Pudihang Lumiu in the murder case of Brigadier N Yosua Hutabarat. Everything?

Romo Magnis was presented as extenuating CTU of the defendant Bharada Richard Eliezer Pudihang Lumiu in connection with Yosua’s murder case in South Jakarta District Court on Monday (26/12/2022). Romo Magnis was presented as an expert in ethical moral philosophy.

Eliezer’s attorney, Ronny Talapessy, initially asked what the elements might be for Eliezer’s relief in the Yosua murder case. Romo Magnis then explained these elements.

“In relation to Eliezer’s killing of Joshua, from the point of view of moral philosophy, what are the elements that can lift Eliezer?” Ronny asked.

Romo Magnis said that in this case Eliezer was ordained by his superior who had a much higher rank, namely Ferdy Sambo. The emeritus professor of moral philosophy at Jakarta’s Driyarkara School of Philosophy said there was a culture of “execution” that Eliezer, who ranks far below in the police force, could not disobey.

“In my opinion, the most relieving thing is the position that gives the order, a high position that clearly gives the order that as, in law enforcement it will definitely be obeyed, it is not possible said Eliezer is 24 years old, so it’s still young to do it, the culture is to do it, it’s the strongest element” said Romo Magnis.

Back then, Father Magnis said, Eliezer was in a tense and confusing situation. Eliezer is believed to have no time to think carefully due to limitations in making decisions.

“The second is, of course, the limits of the tense situation which is very, very confusing, I think about all of that, where at that moment he had to decide whether or not to go through with it, there was no time for careful consideration, where we generally try to make an important decision when we first sleep: “You must react immediately. In my opinion, these are definitely two very ethically mitigating factors,” she said.

Romo Magnis also talked about situations where superiors give orders to shoot in military combat. This is why, according to Father Magnis, if a police superior gives the order to ‘shoot’, it makes no sense.

“Another point, in the police as in military combat situations within the police there may indeed be a situation where a superior gives an order to shoot, in all other professions there is no such thing. So that a Police superior gives an order to shoot it’s not entirely for nothing, it makes sense,” said Father Magnis.

Read more on the next page.