bbc

Labor Reverses Course on Key Workers’⁢ Rights Pledges

LONDON – November 27, 2025 ‍- The Labour government has significantly scaled back its planned workers’ rights ​package, reversing key manifesto pledges amid concerns over economic impact‍ and ⁢parliamentary delays. The ‍move, announced today, represents a major concession too buisness groups and dissenting ​voices within the House of Lords.

The original package, intended to bolster protections for working people, included measures such as day-one sick pay and changes to zero-hours contracts. However, implementation faced months​ of resistance, with peers warning the legislation would stifle job creation. Concerns grew⁤ the entire bill would fail to be ratified before the planned introduction of initial measures in April.

A government source acknowledged ‌the shift, stating ‍the initial consultation ‌had been “filled by people projecting‌ onto ⁢what their worst fears are of it,” ‌but affirmed the ‌government was “driving ​towards” a different outcome.

Outgoing industry body chair Rupert Soames condemned the initial proposals as “incoherent,” arguing they contradicted the government’s stated goals‍ of boosting youth employment and economic growth. “The government says they recognise the drag from burdensome regulation on business… In the face of these two objectives, they have significantly increased the cost of employing people, notably the young,” Soames ‌told delegates, referencing a recent report detailing increased National Insurance contributions for businesses.‍ He also highlighted the forthcoming Employment Rights Bill, which he believes⁢ will “massively increase the regulatory burden and the risk of employment.”

TUC general secretary ​Paul Nowak urged swift action to salvage remaining provisions. “The absolute priority now ⁤is to get these rights – like day one sick pay – on the statute book so that working⁣ people can start ⁤benefitting from‌ them from next April.”

Labour’s political opponents have consistently labelled the package the ​’Unemployment Rights Bill,’ citing fears of a negative impact on job creation. Shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith‍ characterized the reversal as a “humiliating U-turn” and a “conservative victory,” while maintaining the remaining legislation⁢ remains “not fit for purpose.”

The decision comes amid a backdrop of increasing layoffs, with UK ⁢businesses citing both the rise of artificial intelligence and legislative uncertainty​ as contributing ⁣factors.