architecture

Federal Commission Debates architectural styles Amidst Renovations

A recent debate within a federal commission tasked with overseeing architectural design has highlighted a divergence in perspectives on neoclassical versus modern aesthetics, especially in the context of government building renovations. The discussion, as detailed in meeting minutes, touched upon the perceived cost implications of different architectural styles.

Context:

The debate gained traction as the commission considered renovations for federal buildings. One prominent figure in the discussion, a professor of architecture, suggested that stone buildings, often associated with neoclassical designs, do not inherently carry exorbitant costs. Though, he noted that the commission’s mandate did not typically extend to cost-benefit analyses of different architectural approaches, such as comparing the expense of a marble facade versus a glass facade.

The commission’s deliberations reportedly became more contentious following personnel changes made by the Trump administration. The replacement of several members with individuals who, according to a former commission member, often aligned with the sentiments expressed in a draft executive order promoting classical architecture, intensified the debate. This shift in membership led to a more pronounced disagreement on the degree to which renovations should adhere to original designs, a factor that can influence construction costs.In December 2020, President Trump issued an executive order that criticized modernist architecture and advocated for classical designs characterized as “beautiful” and conventional. This order was later revoked by President Biden. However,Trump,upon commencing his second term,reissued the order on his first day in office.The project in question received final approval from the commission in September 2021, after the removal of two Trump appointees, including one who frequently echoed the sentiments favoring classical architecture.

This report was supplemented by contributions from Associated Press writer Seung Min Kim.