Read also: prabowo’s Stance on Hasto Kristiyanto and Tom Lembong of PDI-P
amnesty
President Prabowo Subianto has granted amnesty to Hasto, a former member of the Indonesian Parliament, effectively halting his legal proceedings related to alleged corruption. The decision, announced by Coordinating Minister for Legal, Human Rights, Immigration, adn Correctional Yusril Ihza Mahendra, means Hasto is now free from the legal process.
Hasto had previously been sentenced to 3.5 years in prison by the Jakarta Corruption court, a sentence that was less than the seven years sought by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) prosecutor. The KPK had filed an appeal against the initial verdict.
Minister Yusril Ihza Mahendra stated that the amnesty granted to Hasto, and a similar abolition given to Tom Lembong, aligns with the 1945 Constitution and Emergency Law Number 11 of 1954 concerning Amnesty and Abolition. He clarified that this legal process renders any appeal against the first-level court’s decision unnecessary. The implications of the amnesty for hasto and the abolition for Thomas Lembong are considered identical.
Name: Hasto
Former Position: Member of the Indonesian Parliament
Alleged Crime: Corruption
Initial Sentence: 3.5 years imprisonment
Prosecutor’s Demand: 7 years imprisonment
Court: Jakarta Corruption Court
Appealing Party: Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)
President Granting Amnesty: Prabowo Subianto
Minister Announcing Decision: Yusril Ihza Mahendra (Coordinating minister for Legal, Human Rights, Immigration, and Correctional)
Legal Basis for Amnesty/Abolition: [1945ConstitutionandEmergencyLawNumber11of1954
Other Recipient of Similar Measure: Tom Lembong (Abolition)
Amnesty Granted, Indonesian Instagram Celebrity Jailed in Myanmar Deported
Indonesian Celeb Freed in Myanmar After Amnesty
Jakarta Confirms Deportation of AP Following Prison Sentence
An Indonesian social media influencer, identified by the initials AP, has been granted amnesty and deported from Myanmar after serving part of a seven-year prison sentence. The Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed the development, highlighting ongoing diplomatic efforts.
Diplomatic Push Secures Release
The Indonesian Embassy in Yangon actively advocated for the influencer, whose legal troubles began in December 2024. Rolliansyah “Roy” Soemirat, the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesperson, stated that diplomatic channels were continuously utilized.
“The Myanmar Ministry of Foreign Affairs, on July 16, 2025, delivered a diplomatic note to the Indonesian Embassy in Yangon, informing that amnesty for AP has been granted by the State Administration Council.”
—Rolliansyah “Roy” Soemirat, Spokesperson of the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Coordination with AP’s family was also crucial in the process, leading to a formal request for amnesty submitted to Myanmar authorities. The Ministry expressed gratitude to all parties involved in facilitating the release and the citizen’s return to Indonesia.
Charges and Sentence
AP was initially apprehended on December 20, 2024, facing accusations that included illegal entry into Myanmar and association with an armed opposition group. The charges spanned violations of the Anti-Terrorism Act, Immigration Law, and the Unlawful Associations Act.
Following the judicial proceedings, AP received a seven-year prison term. He was held at Insein Prison in Yangon. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ Director of Indonesian Citizen Protection, Judha Nugraha, confirmed the sentence details.
International efforts to secure the release of citizens detained abroad are ongoing. For instance, the number of foreign nationals detained in Myanmar is difficult to ascertain due to limited transparency, but human rights groups continually monitor such cases.
Deportation and Return Home
Upon receiving amnesty, AP was deported from Myanmar on July 19, 2025. The journey involved transit through Thailand before his arrival back in Indonesia. The Indonesian Embassy in Yangon provided support during his departure.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, under Minister Sugiono, conveyed its appreciation to Myanmar for granting the amnesty, signaling a positive step in bilateral relations concerning citizen welfare.
Puigdemont files complaint against judge for allegedly delaying decision
Madrid. From Waterloo, where he has lived for seven years, former Catalan president Carles Puigdemont filed a complaint with the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) against Supreme Court judge Pablo Llanera, who in his opinion is intentionally delaying the resolution of the appeal he filed so that the general amnesty law can be applied as soon as possible, which would annul the charges against him. Puigdemont is wanted by the Spanish courts, however on August 8 he went to Barcelona to give a rally in the framework of the investiture debate of the socialist Salvador Illa and after speaking to his followers he disappeared and avoided being arrested by the Catalan autonomous police, who had supposedly started a device to carry out his arrest.
The arrest warrant for Puigdemont was issued by Judge Llarena, who is investigating most of the charges against him and who refuses to apply the amnesty law to one of them, the one referring to the crimes of misappropriation of public funds, considering that it is not applicable and that it would go against European regulations in this particularly sensitive area in community institutions. However, Puigdemont filed the complaint against the judge, whom he accused of “inattention and unjustified and repeated delay”, for which he considers that “he has committed a disciplinary infraction by having far exceeded and repeatedly failed to comply with the legal deadline provided for in the Criminal Procedure Law for the resolution of appeals for reform”.
The CGPJ is the governing body of judges and has just been renewed after a long negotiation between the two main political parties, the Popular Party (PP) and the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE). However, it still has to appoint its new president.
#Puigdemont #files #complaint #judge #allegedly #delaying #decision
– 2024-08-25 04:39:13
Valdická jail skilled a drama: We’ve got skilled a prisoner revolt as soon as
On Wednesday, the Jail Service of the Czech Republic carried out a serious raid in Valtická jail. It was a precautionary measure on account of suspicions that the prisoners’ revolt was imminent. Though the suspect was not confirmed, the intervention nonetheless lasted 5 hours and employees from a number of prisons had been concerned.
Nevertheless, this was not the primary downside of this jail just lately. Firstly of June, a big group that smuggled addictive substances went immediately into the jail. A complete of 9 folks had been charged, 5 of whom are prisoners. On the similar time, the jail is named the hardest jail in our nation.
If the revolution actually occurred, this could not be the primary time in our historical past after a revolution. Already in 1990, there was a jail riot in Leopoldovská jail. Then there was violence that needed to be suppressed by drive. This was probably the most severe issues within the newly established democratic state.
Even in Czechoslovakia on the time, it was a troublesome time after the Velvet Revolution. The brand new president Václav Havel tried to vary the society from the prevailing totalitarianism to a new child democracy. Due to this fact, Havel selected a big amnesty. This disturbed many of the prisoners. 23,000 of the whole of 31,000 had been launched.
Amnesty is at all times a controversial resolution and it will depend on its scope and the way society will settle for it. Anyway, the President’s message was clear on the time. He wished to offer a second probability to everybody who doesn’t serve the sentence for severe crimes to reside in a democracy, and on the similar time he wished the communist crimes that occurred due to bad- will right the regime on the time. .
It was in Leopoldov, Slovakia, the place prisoners had been despatched for very severe crimes. However they did not like that they weren’t launched. The entire state of affairs started to boil over when, in March 1990, 217 Leopoldov prisoners led by Tibor Polgário started a starvation strike to protest the discharge.
We are able to solely speculate why the authorities allowed the state of affairs to escalate, however the starvation strike shortly changed into the takeover of a number of jail blocks. However, it took practically two weeks to resolve the state of affairs. It was their laziness that inspired the prisoners to imagine that they had been in management and that they’d fulfill their calls for.
The truth that everybody within the new order was afraid of any violent response could have performed an element. There was concern that this might worsen the notion of our new political management internationally. As well as, a number of others joined the unique prisoners and people who refused had been taken as hostages.
In the long run, it was determined that the entire state of affairs could be dealt with by the military. Along with troopers, she additionally despatched in 6 armored autos with which she started to assault the jail. However the prisoners felt a bonus and began throwing burnt bottles on the navy gear. The entire state of affairs was difficult by the truth that the struggle was additionally occurring contained in the corridors and the cells.
The prisoners had been armed with improvised weapons and weren’t going to give up. As a result of they’d entry to the kitchen, laundry and automotive park, they had been capable of barricade themselves successfully. As well as, they obtained gasoline, which they used to fill the bottles that they threw to the military. They even managed to make a flamethrower.
Most of the prisoners had been drunk or medicine and principally knew that the state of affairs had gone too far. Due to this fact, they knew they’d nothing to lose and hoped that the brand new regime would accommodate them as a substitute of combating them. As well as, the situations within the jail weren’t appropriate and lots of prisoners wished to die for his or her freedom.
The intervention lasted two and a half hours, and in the long run, the prisoners who had been restrained started to threaten to shoot the 2 enemies. Regularly, they began setting fireplace to the jail to maneuver the emergency models out of the constructing. On the finish of the revolution, the unhappy steadiness was 1 prisoner lifeless and 29 wounded; then again, 11 members of the safety forces had been wounded, one in all whom was in a severe situation. Out of 11 buildings, 5 had been burnt to the bottom.
Tibor Polgário was not going to just accept failure
Tibor Polgário was the chief of the complete revolution and even declared himself the director of the jail throughout that point. He was a reporter sentenced to 9 years in jail for theft and extortion. After dropping the battle, he determined to work out an escape plan with 6 different prisoners, which he did the next yr.
He then confirmed that he’s not likely that conversant in violence. First, Tibor himself attacked one of many guards, who was stabbed by one other participant. Tibor placed on his uniform and left with the remainder of the group into the management heart, stabbing a couple of extra guards within the course of. They then fled and stole a number of vehicles. Throughout their escape, they drank alcohol and made one mistake after one other, similar to getting on the fallacious practice. It took 20 hours to catch them.
Tibor Polgário was then sentenced to life imprisonment together with two different accomplices. The remainder of the group had been sentenced to between 13 and 18 years. It was fascinating that the prisoners sympathized as a part of society throughout the revolution. Nevertheless, they dispersed as quickly because it grew to become clear that the masterminds of the revolution had killed a number of guards. Everybody realized that they weren’t nation heroes, however cold-blooded killers and criminals who wished freedom.
2024-07-08 20:27:34
#Valdická #jail #skilled #drama #skilled #prisoner #revolt
Congress definitively approves the amnesty regulation
The Plenary Session of Congress has supported this Thursday with an absolute majority the Amnesty Legislation, thus lifting the Senate’s veto and giving the definitive inexperienced mild to its approval, with which the regulation is distributed to the Official State Gazette (BOE) for publication and entry. in power. In fact, the method has been handed by the minimal, since 176 votes have been wanted and 177 have been added.
Thus, the regulation has gathered the help of 177 deputies from the PSOE, Sumar, Podemos, ERC, Junts, Bildu, PNV, BNG and former minister José Luis Ábalos, in comparison with 172 in opposition to the PP, Vox, Canarian Coalition and UPN. Podemos deputy Martina Velarde didn’t take part within the vote, not even remotely, resulting from a private drawback, and this absence has led to the tightness of the vote.
As requested by the PP, the vote was public and by name, with the deputies standing as much as announce their vote out loud. By draw, voting started with the Sure of the socialist Roberto García Morís, who voted electronically.
Congress definitively approves the amnesty regulation – Picture: CONGRESS by way of Europa Press
Shouts of “traitor” to Sánchez
When President Pedro Sánchez and different members of the Authorities, who voted final, voted, cries of “traitor” have been heard from the Vox bench. And when Vice President María Jesús Montero later advised journalists within the hallways that right this moment was an essential day for coexistence, a Vox deputy handed by including: “And nice to betray.”
The Minister of Justice and Presidency, Félix Bolaños, described in a press convention as “very regrettable” that “far-right parts” have tried to “bust the Plenary Session” and that, as a substitute of utilizing arguments, they’ve devoted themselves to “insulting, muddy, lie and fail to inform the reality”. Additionally the pro-independence Gabriel Rufián, spokesperson for ERC, has accused Vox of attempting to “bust” the session.
As soon as the president of Congress, the socialist Francina Armengol, introduced the vote, the deputies of PSOE, Sumar and the pro-independence formations burst into applause and a few hugged and greeted the visitor gallery, the place they adopted the Plenary session a number of of these convicted by the Supreme Court docket and who will profit from the regulation, reminiscent of Oriol Junqueras (ERC), Jordi Turull (Junts) and Carme Forcadell. For his or her half, the Vox and PP parliamentarians left the chamber.
From the BOE, two months to use it
As soon as the regulation is permitted, the following step will probably be its publication within the Official State Gazette (BOE) with the signature of the King, which in response to Félix Bolaños will probably be carried out within the coming days, complying with the extraordinary procedures. “The procedures which are applicable and obligatory will probably be carried out and, subsequently, it will likely be printed within the BOE within the coming days.”
In line with the laws, any regulation permitted by Parliament is distributed to Relations with the Cortes and the Ministry of the Presidency, which is answerable for managing the signature of the Head of State, after which goes to the BOE for publication. The earlier regulation that Congress permitted, the Creative Schooling Legislation, left the Home on Thursday, Might 23 and has not but been printed.
Its publication within the BOE will mark the entry into power of the regulation and, from there, judges and courts could have two months to use it. In fact, this era will cease if a matter is raised to European justice.
The BOE can even open the deadline for submitting unconstitutionality appeals and at the least the PP has already introduced that it’ll problem it.
Situation for investiture
This “Natural Legislation of amnesty for institutional, political and social normalization in Catalonia” was born from the pacts that the PSOE sealed with ERC and Junts in alternate for the help of the independentistas for the investiture of President Pedro Sánchez.
Its goal is to amnesty all these concerned in sovereign and independence mobilizations from November 1, 2011, when José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero’s PSOE nonetheless ruled, till November 13, 2023. It consists of each these convicted by the referendum of the ninth of November 2014 and people of the 2017 independence referendum, in addition to the archive of the investigations opened by the next riots in opposition to the Supreme Court docket ruling.
The invoice was registered alone by the Socialist Group on November 13 of final 12 months and, though it has been formally processed via the emergency process, it has taken greater than six months to see the ultimate inexperienced mild.
Throughout its passage via Congress, the textual content underwent a number of modifications by advantage of the agreements that the socialists reached with the Catalan independentists and that acquired the help of the remainder of the parliamentary companions.
After its first part of debate within the Justice Fee, the textual content was submitted to the Plenary on January 30, however Junts’ vote in opposition to it prevented it from being despatched to the Senate. Carles Puigdemont’s males pressured their return to the fee as a result of refusal of the PSOE to just accept their amendments on the crimes of terrorism and treason and so they needed to search a brand new pact.
The identical textual content that was agreed in March
The ultimate settlement in Congress was reached within the plenary session on March 14 and the regulation was despatched to the Senate. The PP used its absolute majority within the Higher Home to advertise a regulatory modification that allowed it to ‘retain’ the rule there for 2 months, the utmost set by the Structure, regardless of being processed via the emergency process.
As well as, the Senate started the procedures to boost an unprecedented battle of powers in opposition to Congress as a result of it thought of that the regulation represented a covert constitutional reform, though lastly the ‘widespread’ have given up taking the matter to the Constitutional Court docket.