Al-Ahly Club‘s Presidential Race: A Call for Engagement Amidst Criticism
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia – The presidential election for Saudi football club Al-Ahly is facing scrutiny, with a recent commentary highlighting a perceived lack of robust engagement from club members and a critique of the candidates’ approaches. While rival clubs like Al-Ittihad and Al-Hilal have reportedly seen meaningful financial backing and unanimous support for their presidential choices, Al-Ahly’s situation is described as “different,” still grappling with its “first biography in chasing conspiracy” despite a strong presence in the current football scene.
The commentary, originating from a piece quoted in Okaz, expresses disappointment with the current state of Al-Ahly’s presidential candidacy. It laments that the position of president is seemingly sought after by those primarily interested in the club’s financial resources, deeming this a “shame” and a “cheap price” for such a significant role. The author contrasts this with the perceived dedication and financial commitment seen in other major Saudi clubs.
Specific individuals, including Khaled Al-Ghamdi, Ahmad Jannah, and Ahmad Al-Husaini, are acknowledged for their courage in presenting their candidacies. while the author refrains from joining those who reject them, they express respect for their willingness to step forward. The commentary suggests that khaled Al-Essa might be the most “blessed” among them,though the author personally might not vote for any of the three,emphasizing their respect for the act of presenting themselves.
A significant point of concern raised is the apparent inactivity of the club’s association members and leadership, especially mentioning Khaled Abu Rashid. The author questions whether this body is “dead” or if they are simply “frustrated,” implying a lack of proactive involvement in the club’s governance and electoral processes.
The piece urges Al-Ahly fans to recognize that many who have previously been vocal are now content with merely observing. It encourages them to focus their efforts on those who have actively paid their membership dues to the association, suggesting that this would reveal the true commitment and bravery of the club’s supporters and leadership. The commentary concludes with a stark observation: “Big in the right of Al -ahly that he does not have an association as in its peers…. !!”
The commentary is punctuated by a quote attributed to Fyodor Dostoyevsky: “We fear people more than God. The Lord forgives sin,while humans punish us even for our kindness.” This sentiment appears to reflect a broader concern about societal pressures and the judgment faced by individuals, perhaps in the context of club politics and public opinion.
What’s Your Take on Al-Ahly’s Presidential Election?
The current climate surrounding Al-Ahly’s presidential race has sparked considerable debate. Do you believe the criticism of the candidates and the perceived lack of engagement from the association is justified? What steps do you think can be taken to foster greater participation and ensure the best leadership for the club?
Share your thoughts in the comments below!
If you find this analysis insightful and want to stay updated on the latest developments in Saudi football and beyond, subscribe to World Today news for exclusive content and breaking news.