Veterans Voice Diverse Needs for West LA VAโฃ Campusโฃ Redevelopment
A recent roundtable discussion with veterans highlighted a โcomplex set of needs and concerns surrounding the planned redevelopment of the West Los Angeles โฃVA campus. While theโข VA aimsโข to utilize the campus to address veteran homelessness nationwide, opinions diverge on the scale โand type of housing required, and also the crucial โฃsupport servicesโ neededโฃ for triumphant reintegration into โcivilian life.
The proposedโฃ “National โCenterโ for Warrior Independence” has sparked debate, notably regarding the potentialโข influx of veterans from across theโข country. Some, like โArmy veteran Rob Begland, expressed concern over the idea of concentrating 6,000 veterans inโ Los Angeles, โคwhile concurrently emphasizing โขthe importance of serving veterans beyond the local area.โค Begland โฃunderscored the fundamental duty to facilitate veterans’ reintegrationโ into society,โฃ advocating for robust vocational training programs.
A keyโฃ issue raised by veterans was the unintended consequences โof current VA housing policies. Air Forceโฃ veteran Robert Canas โฃdescribed a frustrating dilemma: accessing educational or โฃemploymentโฃ opportunities risksโ evictionโ from VA-provided housing. This creates a barrier โto self-sufficiency, effectively penalizing veterans for striving to rebuild โtheirโ lives.
Several proposals wereโข offered to address these โขchallenges. Anthony Allman, of Vets Advisory, suggested aโ collaborative effort between the VA โand community โcolleges โto create housing specifically for โฃstudent veterans. Sal Grammatico, โคa long-time advocate forโ the campus, stressed the need to allocate housing for patientsโค undergoing treatment at the VA hospital, differentiating between transitional,โค permanent, and treatment-related โhousing needs.
the importanceโ of โฃtailored โhousing options was a โrecurring theme. Reynoldsโข highlighted the success โof the campus’s โ”harm reduction” tiny home village โin assisting veterans struggling with substance abuse, but also emphasized the need forโค sober living environments and dedicated support โfor those withโฃ severe mental illness.Though, existing housing on the campusโค faces meaningful challenges. veterans โdescribed serious safetyโ concerns, with โคCanas detailingโ instances of drug activity and even fatalities within buildings due to a lack of โadequate support โคservices. โฃ
Following the roundtable, Congressmen Takano and Sherman pledged to introduce legislationโค aimed atโ increasing openness and addressing the issues raised. Sherman acknowledged โคthe inherent tension between incentivizing self-sufficiency and fostering a supportive veteran community,โ butโ ultimately prioritized theโข immediate need to “get people indoors.”
The discussion underscored that successful redevelopment โof theโ West LA VA โcampus requires a nuanced approach, prioritizing not โjust housing, โbut โฃalso comprehensive support services, individualized housing options, and a commitment to removing barriers to veterans’ โขlong-term well-being and reintegration.