Home » News » Supreme Court Adjourns Bail Pleas in Delhi Riots Case

Supreme Court Adjourns Bail Pleas in Delhi Riots Case

by Emma Walker – News Editor

Supreme Court Delays Ruling on Bail for ⁢Umar Khalid, Others ‍in​ Delhi Riots Case

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today​ adjourned hearings regarding the bail petitions of Umar Khalid, Gulfisha Fatima, Sharjeel Imam, Meeran Haider, ​and Shifa-Ur-Rehman – all accused in the 2020 Delhi riots ⁤”larger conspiracy” case – until ‍September 22. The ‌court was ⁤hearing appeals challenging a September 2, 2023, Delhi High‌ Court decision that ⁢denied bail to these individuals, who have been in custody for over five years.

The case centers around allegations that these activists and⁤ students conspired ‍to incite the violence that erupted​ in⁤ northeast Delhi in February⁤ 2020. The ongoing legal battle highlights the complexities of balancing national security concerns ​with fundamental rights to freedom and due process, and the prolonged detention of ⁤the accused raises questions ​about the ⁣pace of justice in sensitive cases involving accusations ​of sedition and terrorism under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

The individuals involved in the case, alongside others​ previously arrested, include Tahir Hussain, Khalid Saifi, Isharat Jahan, Asif Iqbal ​Tanha⁤ (granted bail in 2021), Shadab Ahmed, Tasleem Ahmed,​ Saleem Malik, Mohd. Saleem ​Khan, Athar Khan, Safoora Zargar (granted bail on humanitarian grounds), and ⁣Faizan Khan. Devangana Kalita and‍ Natasha Narwal were also granted‌ bail previously.

The⁢ specific cases before the Supreme Court are:

  1. UMAR KHALID ⁣v. STATE OF NCT ⁣OF DELHI | SLP(Crl)​ No. 14165/2025
  2. GULFISHA FATIMA v STATE (GOVT. ‍OF NCT OF ⁢DELHI ) | SLP(Crl) No. 13988/2025
  3. SHARJEEL IMAM v THE STATE ⁢NCT⁢ OF​ DELHI |‍ SLP(Crl) No. 14030/2025
  4. MEERAN HAIDER v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI | SLP(Crl) No. 14132/2025
  5. SHIFA UR REHMAN v STATE OF NATIONAL​ CAPITAL TERRITORY | SLP(Crl) No.14859/2025

The September 22 hearing will determine whether the accused will remain in custody pending trial or be granted⁤ provisional release.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.