Report: Enterprises Waste 28% of Software Budgets on Unwanted Upgrades
Enterprise-sized businesses spend an average of 28 percent of their software budgets on unwanted upgrades, migrations, and licensing changes that IT leaders often believe are detrimental, according to a report published by ccstartup.com.
The Tech TL;DR:
- Large enterprises allocate 28 percent of total software budgets to unwanted upgrades, migrations, and licensing changes.
- Ninety-five percent of CIOs and senior IT decision-makers report purchasing vendor-driven changes that they expected would decrease system performance, reliability, or business value.
- Seventy-six percent of IT leaders state their organizations have little power in negotiations.
The Multi-Billion-Dollar Cost of Unwanted Software Spending
The financial scale of these forced modifications emerged from a survey of 2,018 chief information officers and senior IT decision-makers at companies with at least 10,000 employees and $1 billion in annual revenue, as daily.dev reported. Approximately half of the respondents operated within the United States, while the remainder worked in the United Kingdom. Origina, a firm that provides maintenance for enterprise software, commissioned the research report titled “The Software Tax,” which was conducted by the third-party research consultancy Censuswide.
High Rates of Detrimental Vendor-Driven Purchases
Among the most concerning metrics in the report, 95 percent of respondents stated that their organization had paid for a vendor-driven upgrade, migration, or licensing modification over the preceding three years that they believed at the time would reduce performance, reliability, or business value. Furthermore, 53 percent of those IT leaders reported experiencing this exact scenario more than once.

Negotiating Power and Vendor Lock-In Realities
The underlying driver of these unwanted expenditures is a severe imbalance in contract negotiations. Seventy-six percent of respondents agreed strongly or somewhat that their organization has little power during negotiations. Additionally, 80 percent indicated that attempting to migrate away from major vendors would trigger significant disruption.
Tomás O’Leary, CEO and founder of Origina and one of the report’s authors, explained the dilemma in an official statement provided to ccstartup.com: “When the alternative to an unwanted upgrade is losing support on systems the business runs on, saying yes is often a rational response. That’s exactly the problem. The market has left some of the most experienced technology leaders in the world with little room to refuse, and that cost shows up in budgets, in engineering time, and in innovation that never gets funded.”

Independent Maintenance Offers Alternative to Vendor Lock-In
While the report points toward independent software maintenance as a way for IT leaders to regain control over software budgets, the underlying business relationship remains strained by vendor lock-in. Because Origina provides maintenance services, the findings highlight a commercial alternative to vendor-mandated lifecycles, though enterprise technology officers must weigh the potential bias of the sponsoring firm against their immediate infrastructure dependencies.
# Example: Checking package dependencies before a mandatory vendor patch
npm audit --json
kubectl get deployments --all-namespaces
Disclaimer: The technical analyses and security protocols detailed in this article are for informational purposes only. Always consult with certified IT and cybersecurity professionals before altering enterprise networks or handling sensitive data.