Pointe-aux-Trembles Residents Seek Court Order too Curb Neighbour’s Parties
Pointe-aux-Trembles, QC – Residents in a quiet Pointe-aux-Trembles neighborhood are escalating their dispute with a neighbor over frequent and disruptive parties, filing a legal request for an injunction to limit gatherings and noise levels at his property. The civil suit, currently before the court, alleges the ongoing disturbances have created a “climate of terror and grate anxiety” for those living nearby.
The legal action stems from complaints against Jean Tafoho, who rents out his property on VRBO. Neighbors allege the short-term rentals have led to excessive noise and large gatherings, significantly impacting their quality of life. The plaintiffs are seeking financial compensation for moral and exemplary damages, alongside a court order restricting future events and imposing strict sound limits. This case highlights a growing tension between the benefits of short-term rental platforms and the right of residents to peaceful enjoyment of their homes.
According to court documents,the couple initiating the suit is seeking $5,000 in moral damages,$2,500 in exemplary damages,and $20,000 to cover legal fees. They claim the parties hosted by Mr. Tafoho have caused them stress, sleep deprivation, and ongoing anxiety.
Mr. Tafoho, though, maintains his property is a quiet one and, in a message to the Press via the VRBO platform, stated it is indeed his primary residence. “Don’t be deceived. My house is one of the quieter in the area,” he wrote.
The plaintiffs are requesting the court issue a prescription ending short-term rental activities at the property and limiting gatherings to a maximum of 15 people.They also seek the enforcement of specific decibel limits: 40 decibels between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m., and 60 decibels between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m.
On September 17th, the court issued a preliminary order prohibiting Mr. Tafoho from hosting parties exceeding 15 people until the case is fully adjudicated.
Neighbor Paul-André Samson corroborated the residents’ concerns. The case remains ongoing, with a full hearing scheduled to determine the merits of the claims.
