Home » World » Philippines Flood Corruption: Anger and Protests Over Billions Lost

Philippines Flood Corruption: Anger and Protests Over Billions Lost

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

Okay, ⁤here’s a news article crafted⁢ from the provided ⁣text, focusing⁣ on the corruption scandal in the Philippines‘ flood control projects,⁢ while adhering‌ to your “100%⁢ original,⁣ verifiable facts only”⁤ requirement.I’ve structured it as a news report, aiming for a neutral and informative tone. I’ve not attempted to shoehorn in the “EU eyes deeper India alliance” request, as that topic is entirely absent from⁤ the source material. I will, however, include a disclaimer at the end explaining this.


Philippine ⁣Flood Control Funds Misappropriated, Sparking‌ Public Outrage and Goverment Response

Manila, Philippines – A major corruption‌ scandal involving billions of pesos allocated‍ for flood control projects in the Philippines has ignited widespread public anger and prompted a government response, including the resignation⁢ of a cabinet member‍ and the ⁣launch of multiple investigations. The crisis comes as the nation faces increasing vulnerability to typhoons and extreme weather ⁢events exacerbated by climate change.

Recent investigations⁢ have revealed ‌important⁤ irregularities⁢ in the use of 545⁣ billion pesos (approximately $9.54 billion USD) designated for flood‌ control spending since 2022. President⁢ Ferdinand Marcos Jr. announced last month that an internal audit uncovered thousands of projects that were‍ either substandard, lacked proper documentation, or were entirely non-existent⁢ – ‍frequently enough referred to ⁢as⁣ “ghost projects.”

The scandal led to ‍the resignation of Manuel M. Bonoan, Secretary ⁢of Public works ⁣and highways, ⁢shortly after the initial findings were⁣ announced. A subsequent congressional inquiry has linked Bonoan to a “growing family business” allegedly benefiting​ from government flood control contracts.

In response to growing public pressure and the involvement of multiple political figures, President Marcos last week established an​ self-reliant commission,​ headed by a​ former Supreme Court justice, with a ⁢mandate to hold ‍all those responsible accountable, ​irrespective of their position.

Finance ‌Secretary Ralph Recto testified during ⁢a Senate hearing ⁣on September ‌3rd⁢ that economic losses due to corruption in these⁣ projects may average $2.1 billion annually between 2023 and⁤ 2025. ‍ These losses are primarily attributed to the prevalence of ghost ⁣projects.

The‍ revelations have fueled widespread protests across the country,organized by‌ a coalition of activists,former government officials,Catholic church leaders,retired military personnel,and anti-corruption watchdogs. Large-scale demonstrations are planned for September 21st in Metro ⁢Manila, coinciding with the‌ anniversary of the 1972 ‍martial law⁢ declaration ⁢under President ​Marcos’s father. Approximately 100 organizations‍ are expected to participate, with organizers, including prof.David Michael San​ Juan of the civic alliance Tama Na, estimating a turnout of around 100,000 people.

Residents living in flood-prone areas ⁤have expressed frustration and a sense of betrayal. ⁤ As stated by‌ one resident, Yambot, ​”All⁤ that money goes into their pockets while poor people like us suffer… Ther’s no justice.”

Prof. San‌ Juan emphasized the severity⁤ of the‍ situation, stating, “In every​ administration,‍ there’s always a corruption⁣ case.‍ But this time, it’s really terrible‌ as it’s money that is supposed to be used⁢ to protect⁤ Filipinos from floods.” He also highlighted the increasing frequency and intensity of flooding in the Philippines due to‍ climate‌ change, making⁣ the misappropriation of funds notably ‌damaging.

The protesters are demanding the removal, arrest, and⁣ imprisonment of all individuals involved in the anomalous flood control projects, spanning the ⁢administrations of former President ‍Duterte and the current President Marcos.


Disclaimer:

This article is⁣ based ‌ solely on the‌ provided text. The ‌prompt requested a focus on “EU eyes deeper India alliance,” but this topic is entirely absent from the source⁢ material. Thus,I have not included it to maintain the integrity‌ of the “100% original,verifiable facts only” ‍requirement. ⁢ Adding information not present in ⁤the source would‌ constitute fabrication.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.