Home » Business » New Hampshire State Reimburses Schools $1.2M for Education Funding Lawsuit

New Hampshire State Reimburses Schools $1.2M for Education Funding Lawsuit

by Priya Shah – Business Editor

New ⁢Hampshire Schools Reimbursed $1.2 Million in Attorney’s Fees from State Funding Case

School districts involved in​ a lawsuit challenging ⁤New Hampshire’s⁤ school funding ⁣formula are receiving roughly $1.2⁢ million in reimbursed attorney’s fees, a result hailed as a victory for public education advocates. The reimbursement confirms “that ⁣school districts can successfully challenge ⁤systemic constitutional failures ⁢and be made whole again,” ‍said school board member Robin Forrest in an interview.

Eighteen⁢ school districts and two individuals, including Hopkinton and⁤ Hillsboro-Deering, initially joined the lawsuit, ConVal v. State⁤ of New Hampshire. A formula was ⁣used to determine each plaintiff’s contribution to‍ the legal⁣ fees as the‍ case progressed.

Along ‍with‌ the districts, ⁢the law firm representing them, Wadleigh Starr & Peters, will‍ receive approximately $800,000 from⁢ the state. Attorney ‍Michael tierney explained the firm charged clients roughly half the market rate with an ​agreement⁢ to⁣ be “made whole” if attorney’s fees were recovered.

The⁤ $2 million in attorney’s‍ fees⁣ represents only a portion of the total state expenditure defending the case. The Concord Monitor submitted a public records request to the attorney general’s office for a complete accounting,‍ with⁤ responsive documents expected by October 31st.

Rockingham Superior Court Judge ‍David Ruoff⁣ awarded the plaintiffs the fees ‌based on the legal principle of “substantial benefit,” finding the lawsuit benefited the⁤ public at large. The New⁢ Hampshire Supreme Court affirmed the⁤ lower⁢ court’s ruling ‌in July, calling on the state legislature ⁢to nearly ‍double the base ⁣per-pupil state funding for K-12 education.

While the Court characterized the lower court’s per-pupil figure as a “conservative minimum threshold,” it did‍ not immediately order ⁣the ‌legislature to adopt the change. Lawmakers have been debating the ⁤Court’s ⁤order this fall, and ⁤as of yet, no changes to ⁣the ​funding formula have been implemented.

If adopted, the⁢ court-ordered funding change would increase the percentage of education ⁤funding provided by the state, potentially reducing disparities in local property taxes between ‍towns. ‍Currently, New Hampshire spends ⁤the lowest percentage of its budget on state-level education funding, according to a report by ⁢the National⁢ Education Association.

“To successfully advocate for students’ rights and then for the⁣ final financial burden not to fall ​on our local taxpayers‍ is ‍great as it sends a clear message​ that the monetary responsibility ⁤of upholding the essential right ‌of an ⁣adequate ⁤education belongs to⁤ the⁣ state, ​and not with the local taxpayers,” Forrest stated.

tierney confirmed that some reimbursement checks⁤ have already been distributed to school districts, with the remainder to be sent this week. The⁣ amount each district receives will vary depending on when​ they joined‍ the litigation. ‍Forrest indicated her school board has not‍ yet determined how it will utilize​ the funds.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.