Home » Entertainment » Minister retains decision-making power in new nature laws | Australian politics

Minister retains decision-making power in new nature laws | Australian politics

Labor’s New Environmental Laws Grant Minister Final Approval Power Over ⁢Projects

CANBERRA – Australia’s long-awaited new environmental protection laws will allow the Minister for the Environment to ‍retain final say over controversial projects, despite calls for a fully autonomous Environmental Protection Authority (EPA). The legislation, unveiled today, requires proponents of heavy polluting projects to disclose greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation plans, but stops short of mandating consideration of climate impacts in decision-making.

The laws represent a ​compromise following pressure from both environmental groups and ⁤industry, and come as the government seeks to balance environmental‍ protection with economic progress. ​The new framework aims ⁢to streamline⁢ environmental assessments, but critics argue it weakens safeguards ⁢against environmentally damaging projects, especially those contributing to climate ​change. The changes affect a broad range of stakeholders, including conservationists, ⁣businesses, and communities​ possibly ‌impacted by large-scale developments.

Australian Conservation Foundation acting chief executive Paul Sinclair expressed disappointment that the proposed EPA would not be ⁤fully ⁤independent, advocating for a⁣ system where the minister sets​ nature protection rules and the​ EPA assesses projects ‍against them. “Arm’s length‌ decision⁣ making is better⁤ for nature and better for business,” he said.

The Greens environment spokesperson, Sarah Hanson-Young, warned the⁣ EPA risked becoming “another branch of government bureaucracy” without⁤ stronger enforcement⁢ powers. She also criticized the removal of a proposed “climate trigger” that could have blocked or restricted fossil fuel projects.

“They’ve ‌taken the climate trigger off the table because they’re‍ doing the bidding​ of the fossil fuel ​companies,” Hanson-Young stated. “now‌ if we negotiate, the government’s going to have ⁢to come up with ‌what they are prepared to do to protect the climate and to​ protect our forests.”

Under⁢ the ‌new laws, projects like Woodside’s ​North-West Shelf extension could still be approved despite‌ their potential climate impacts, as decision-makers are not legally obligated⁤ to⁢ consider greenhouse gas emissions during the assessment process. Hanson-Young indicated the Greens are prepared to negotiate ‌with Labor on alternative mechanisms to address⁣ climate impacts.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.