Home » News » Marriage penalty: National Council narrowly rejects the middle initiative

Marriage penalty: National Council narrowly rejects the middle initiative

by Chief editor of world-today-news.com

Marriage Penalty Initiative⁣ Narrowly Defeated in ‌National ⁢Council

Bern,‌ Switzerland – The Swiss National Council⁤ today rejected a motion to abolish the marriage penalty in ‍federal tax law, voting 99 to 97 ‍against the initiative proposed by centrist and⁤ right-wing parties. The closely contested ‌vote‌ followed​ an emotionally ‌charged debate, highlighting deep divisions within the parliament regarding fairness in the ⁤tax system and the value of traditional family structures.

The “marriage penalty” arises from Switzerland’s​ individual taxation system, where married couples can ⁢sometimes pay more tax‍ than two‌ single​ individuals with the same‌ combined ‌income. Abolishing​ it has been a long-standing goal of conservative groups who ⁣argue it unfairly disadvantages‌ married couples. While the initiative​ failed to pass, the narrow ⁣margin signals continued pressure for tax​ reform and the potential for future attempts to address⁣ the issue.

The initiative⁢ was spearheaded⁢ by The Center party‌ and the Swiss People’s⁤ party (SVP).⁢ Opponents, including the Social ⁣Democratic Party (SP) and the Green Party, argued that ⁢eliminating the marriage penalty ‍would ⁤disproportionately benefit higher-income earners and undermine the progressive nature​ of the tax system.

During the debate, SVP National Councillor ⁢Esther Friedli passionately defended the initiative, stating that the​ current system “punishes” marriage and creates financial disincentives for couples. Conversely, SP National councillor samira Marti⁤ countered that the initiative would exacerbate existing inequalities⁣ and provide a tax break to those ‌who need ‌it least.

The outcome leaves the current tax system unchanged. The federal government estimates that abolishing the marriage penalty ⁢would cost the ‌state approximately CHF 800‍ million annually. ⁢ The debate ‍is expected ⁤to⁤ continue at the cantonal level, where ⁢some cantons have ‍already taken⁢ steps to ‍mitigate the marriage ​penalty within their own tax frameworks.

Quentin Schlapbach, a‌ correspondent in the Bundeshaus for Tagesanzeiger, reports he is a board member of Lobbywatch, a non-profit ⁢association committed​ to transparency in ⁢Swiss ‍politics. readers ​can ⁤report errors to tagesleitung.korrektorat@tamedia.ch.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.