The Debate Over Medical Device Use by Oriental Medicine Doctors in Korea
A significant conflict is unfolding in South Korea regarding the use of medical devices, specifically diagnostic tools like ultrasound, by doctors of oriental Medicine (omds). The Korean Medical Association (KMA) strongly opposes this practice, arguing it represents an illegal overstep of licensing boundaries and poses a risk too public health.Conversely, the Korean Oriental Medical Association (KOMA) supports allowing OMDs to utilize these devices, believing it enhances diagnostic accuracy and patient care.
The KMA’s core argument centers on the differing levels of training. They contend that OMDs,lacking the comprehensive education of conventionally trained doctors in interpreting medical imaging,are prone to misdiagnosis,potentially leading to harmful consequences for patients. They frame the use of such equipment by OMDs as effectively practicing medicine without a license.
KOMA, though, emphasizes the potential benefits for patient well-being. They argue that access to tools like ultrasound can improve the precision of diagnoses within the framework of Oriental Medicine, ultimately leading to safer and more effective treatment.
This dispute is further complex by evolving court rulings that have blurred the lines defining the scope of medical practice.The article highlights the urgent need to address the educational disparities between the two medical systems and establish clear lines of responsibility. Without resolution, both the quality of care and patient safety are jeopardized.
Proposed solutions focus on a tiered system of device access. The article suggests mandatory training and national certification for OMDs wishing to utilize specific medical devices, with higher-level imaging requiring medical school-level radiology education and substantial clinical experience. A standardized evaluation system to assess competency is also recommended.
Furthermore, the existence of approximately 180 practitioners holding dual licenses as both doctors and OMDs presents an opportunity. Institutionalizing integrated medical and Oriental Medicine treatment centers could generate valuable clinical and economic data demonstrating the effectiveness and safety of collaborative care. This data could then pave the way for a more unified approach to healthcare.
Ultimately,the article argues that the issue transcends a simple licensing debate. It calls for a phased integration of the dual medical system, prioritizing patient safety and quality of care. The long-term vision suggests a unification of conventional medicine, Oriental Medicine, and modern, science-based medicine, potentially offering the most efficient and comprehensive healthcare solution for Korea.
