Home » Entertainment » Kangana Ranaut Defamation Case: SC Dismisses Plea

Kangana Ranaut Defamation Case: SC Dismisses Plea

by Julia Evans – Entertainment Editor

Supreme Court Allows Defamation Case Against Kangana ⁤Ranaut ⁤to Proceed

Kangana‌ Ranaut, actor ⁢and Member of Parliament, ‍has withdrawn her petition⁢ to the Supreme Court seeking to⁣ quash‌ a criminal defamation complaint ‌filed‌ against her. The case⁢ originates from a 2020 ‍retweet concerning the farmers’ protests against​ the ​now-repealed farm laws.

A bench comprised of Justices Vikram Nath​ and Sandeep Mehta declined​ to hear‌ Ranaut’s plea on​ Friday, September 12, 2025, and​ permitted her counsel to withdraw it, suggesting she pursue remedies within​ the trial​ court. This follows a previous ‍dismissal of her plea by the Punjab ⁤and Haryana High ⁣Court.

the High‌ Court had‍ ruled‌ that Ranaut failed to‌ demonstrate good faith in the allegedly⁣ defamatory post. It also emphasized the “extra responsibility” borne by public figures ⁣with large social media⁢ followings to⁢ verify‌ the accuracy of their statements.

During ⁤the Supreme Court hearing, Justice Mehta expressed concern over the content of ‍Ranaut’s ‌retweet, noting she had “added her own comments”​ and “added spice” to the original⁤ post.while Ranaut’s counsel stated a clarification had been issued,Justice‍ Mehta directed that the clarification​ be presented to the trial court. The bench also cautioned ‍against arguing⁤ the ⁣merits of the​ tweet⁤ before ⁢them, stating it could‍ potentially prejudice her defense⁤ during⁢ trial.

The​ complaint was initially filed in January 2021 by Mahinder Kaur, a 73-year-old protester from Punjab, alleging⁣ defamation.⁤ Kaur claimed she was wrongly identified as Bilkis Bano, a participant in the⁢ Shaheen⁢ Bagh protests against the⁤ Citizenship (Amendment) Act, in a retweet shared by⁢ Ranaut.The ‌retweet falsely linked Kaur to the Shaheen Bagh protests while claiming ⁢she was also involved in the⁣ farmers’ agitation.

The case is registered under Sections 499 and 500 of⁣ the ‌indian Penal​ Code, pertaining ​to defamation. A ⁣summoning‌ order was issued by​ a Magistrate in February⁤ 2022,⁢ requiring Ranaut to face trial.⁤ The High Court upheld this order, citing ⁢sufficient prima facie evidence of defamation and‍ noting Ranaut’s failure to apologize after learning the data was inaccurate.

With the withdrawal of her petition,the Supreme Court recorded the matter as “dismissed ⁢as withdrawn,” allowing ⁤the defamation case to proceed in ⁣the trial court.

Published: September‍ 12, 2025 01:56 pm ⁣IST.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.