Home » News » Is a 50-year mortgage really that much crazier than a 30-year one? : Planet Money : NPR

Is a 50-year mortgage really that much crazier than a 30-year one? : Planet Money : NPR

by David Harrison – Chief Editor

The 50-Year ​Mortgage:​ A Question ​of Systemic Issues, Not Just Loan Length

The idea of a ‍50-year‌ mortgage ‍has recently surfaced as a⁢ potential solution to ‍housing affordability, but experts suggest the core problems lie deeper than simply extending loan terms. A ‌recent NPR Planet Money report highlights ⁣that​ many​ of ‌the issues associated with ⁢a 50-year mortgage already exist within the ‍current 30-year system, and that increasing housing ⁢supply is the essential need.

One​ meaningful problem is refinancing.⁣ According to researcher Campbell, “a lot of ⁢people don’t know⁢ when to refinance and they just don’t do it.” ‌This inaction disproportionately ⁤affects Black and Hispanic borrowers, who are demonstrably slower to refinance than white borrowers, leading to them paying higher‌ interest rates.

Further complicating the market is “lock-in,” ⁣a phenomenon where homeowners with exceptionally low, ‌fixed interest rates – ⁤a situation many current homeowners find themselves ‍in – ⁤are hesitant to ⁤sell, even⁢ as interest ‌rates rise. This reluctance is contributing ⁤to ​”stubbornly high” home prices,‍ contrasting with other countries where adjustable-rate mortgages are more common ‍and housing prices have seen more significant dips in response to‌ interest rate increases. Fairweather ‍notes this creates⁣ an “unequal treatment between‌ first time home ​buyers and existing homeowners,” ‌benefiting those who have owned homes longer.Economists also believe this lock-in⁤ negatively impacts the broader economy, potentially preventing people ‍from pursuing more productive job opportunities due to the disincentive to move and lose their low mortgage rate.

The motivation behind considering a 50-year mortgage is to increase homeownership access ‌amidst high ⁤prices and rising interest rates. However, experts universally agree that this alone won’t solve‌ the affordability‍ crisis.the report stresses the⁣ critical need to increase housing⁢ supply.

Campbell ⁢argues that initiatives aimed at helping buyers, including both a 50-year mortgage and proposals‍ like direct financial assistance to first-time ⁢homebuyers, primarily benefit sellers. ⁢With limited supply, increased demand simply drives up⁢ prices as buyers compete for the same properties.

Ultimately, while a 50-year mortgage coudl offer some benefits in a ⁣market ⁢with increased ‍housing supply, its not a standalone solution. Duke economist Berger recommends government‍ investment in financial literacy​ programs to ⁢help Americans​ better understand mortgages and explore ⁤option financial ⁤options,⁤ acknowledging ⁣the inherent complexity of these financial ‍products.The core issue, ⁤however, remains the need⁤ to build​ more homes.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.