‘Wicked: Part Two’ Receives Mixed Reviews, Lacking the Initial Film’s Magic
The highly anticipated sequel to the blockbuster film adaptation of the broadway musical Wicked is drawing a more muted response from critics, with many noting a tonal shift adn a challenge in replicating the impact of the first installment. Released last November,Wicked: Part One captivated audiences worldwide,earning over £750 million at the box office and garnering accolades including two Oscars and two Baftas for costume and production design,alongside a Golden Globe for cinematic and box office achievement.
The sequel faces the unique hurdle of following a film brimming with Wicked’s most recognizable songs-including “Popular” and “The Wizard and I”-a challenge inherent in both the film and stage versions. Reviewers have pointed to a perceived lack of a comparable musical centerpiece in the second act, mirroring concerns previously expressed about the Broadway and West End productions.
The cast includes returning stars Cynthia erivo and Ariana Grande, alongside Jeff Goldblum, Jonathan Bailey, and Michelle Yeoh.Though, critics like Peter Debruge have observed a less buoyant atmosphere. ”The tone is different from that of the first film: less peppy, more glum,” Debruge wrote.
Empire’s review, penned by Ian Nugent, echoed this sentiment, stating that, with the exception of Goldblum’s performance-described as “delighting in stuttery drollness”-characters appear “much less cheerful than they were last time around,” ultimately diminishing the viewing experience. The two films were shot simultaneously, a production strategy that now appears to have presented unique challenges in maintaining consistent artistic momentum.
