Home » Entertainment » FCC Chair Accused of Intimidation, Bonta Urges Free Speech Defense

FCC Chair Accused of Intimidation, Bonta Urges Free Speech Defense

by Julia Evans – Entertainment Editor

California Attorney General Demands FCC chair Address Threats to Free Speech ​After kimmel Suspension

California Attorney​ general Rob Bonta has​ called on Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chair Brendan Carr to “stop his ‌campaign ‍of censorship” and ⁤reaffirm ⁣his⁣ commitment to‍ protecting free ⁢speech in the United⁣ States. The ⁣demand follows the brief suspension ⁢of ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” after remarks made by Kimmel regarding the shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk’s‌ campaign staffer.

The controversy began after Kimmel, during a monologue, criticized reactions to‍ the shooting, stating the U.S. had “hit⁢ some new lows” ​with attempts⁤ to downplay the shooter’s​ potential affiliations.In ‌response, Carr appeared on a conservative podcast ‌and ‌suggested that media companies⁢ could “take action” against Kimmel, ‍adding that there⁢ would ⁤be “additional work for ⁢the FCC‌ ahead.”

Following Carr’s‍ comments, two major owners of ABC affiliates announced they would drop Kimmel’s show, ⁢leading ABC to announce an indefinite preemption of the program. This prompted‍ concerns from constitutional scholars and ⁢first Amendment advocates who argued the management and carr were exerting inappropriate pressure on media ‍companies.

In a ‍letter to Carr, ‍Bonta ‍specifically⁢ requested⁤ “an express disavowal” of his previous threats and “an unambiguous ‌pledge” that he will not use the FCC “to retaliate against⁤ private parties” for speech he disagrees with. Bonta acknowledged the show’s return to broadcast but‍ emphasized that this did not negate the chilling effect of Carr’s earlier statements on free speech.

The incident occurred alongside the ​cancellation of “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” ‍by CBS, sparking a broader debate about freedom of speech. Both⁤ Kimmel and Colbert are known critics of​ former President Trump, while Kirk is a ‍vocal supporter.

Experts have ​voiced strong ⁢criticism ‍of Carr’s actions. erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the⁢ UC Berkeley Law​ School, described them as⁢ part of a broader “assault⁤ on free speech” demonstrating “a stunning ignorance and ‍disregard of the 1st amendment.” Summer Lopez, interim co-chief ⁢executive⁣ of PEN America, called it “a dangerous moment for free speech,” citing Carr’s threats alongside⁤ othre Trump administration actions, ⁣including statements about “hate speech” ⁤by Attorney General Pam Bondi and new Pentagon⁤ restrictions on journalists ​reporting on the U.S. military. ​

Notably, criticism has also come from within conservative ‌circles. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas), chairman of the Senate Commerce committee which oversees‌ the FCC, stated on his podcast that⁣ Carr’s actions were “unbelievably dangerous” ⁢and could be used to‍ “silence every conservative in America,” despite acknowledging a working relationship with⁣ Carr. Cruz described​ the suggestion of ⁤government intervention⁢ in broadcast content ‍as “dangerous as hell.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.