Indonesia Election Law: Constitutional Court Decision Separates National & Regional Legislative Elections, perhaps Extending DPRD Terms
Jakarta – The Indonesian Constitutional CourtS (MK) decision to separate national legislative elections (DPR & DPD) from regional legislative elections (DPRD) is prompting strategic adjustments from political parties like the Democrats. Secretary General Herman Khaeron acknowledged the binding nature of the ruling and highlighted potential ramifications, including a possible two-year extension of the DPRD’s term of office [[source]].
This separation necessitates a re-evaluation of party management periodization,traditionally aligned with five-year election cycles. With the prospect of two elections – central and regional – occurring within a shorter timeframe, parties must adapt their strategies and resource allocation.
Khaeron emphasized the financial implications of holding elections twice as frequently, requiring careful consideration of campaign financing and candidate socialization. The Democrats are currently reviewing the full impact of the MK’s decision, alongside ongoing discussions regarding revisions to the Election Law in Parliament [[source]].
The core of indonesia’s election law is governed by law No. 7 of 2017, wich covers all aspects of the electoral process Police, and the Supreme Court [[2]]. Recent attempts to revise these laws have faced public opposition, even leading to the cancellation of ratification plans [[3]].
Key Takeaways:
Separation of Elections: The MK decision splits national and regional legislative elections.
Potential DPRD Term Extension: DPRD terms could be extended by two years.
Financial Implications: Parties face increased financial burdens with more frequent elections.
Law No. 7 of 2017: Remains the foundational legal framework for indonesian elections
