The Changing Heart of Medicine: Prioritizing Empathy in a New Era
Deputy General manager Kim Byung-chae
The recent dispute over medical school expansion, now largely resolved with the return of protesting residents, has left a lingering unease within hospitals. While the immediate conflict has subsided, the relationships between professors and residents remain strained. Many professors express concern over a perceived lack of dedication among returning residents, preferring to collaborate with physician Assistants who have consistently provided care.
This shift signals a essential change in the traditional dynamic of medical training and practice – a move away from the long-held, often rigorous, master-apprentice model towards a more conventional colleague-to-colleague relationship. While seemingly innocuous, this alteration could negatively impact patient care, as patients frequently enough find reassurance in the close dialog and established rapport between senior physicians and their trainees.
The core question at the heart of this situation, and a broader societal debate, is: “What defines a doctor?” Historically, Korean society equated medical excellence with academic brilliance. A “good doctor” was one who advanced medical knowledge,uncovering new treatments and understanding disease mechanisms. The emphasis was on objective diagnosis and clinical precision, prioritizing analytical skill over bedside manner.
Naturally, those with exceptional academic abilities gravitated towards medicine. As advancements in healthcare dramatically reduced infant mortality and increased life expectancy, the doctor’s role became increasingly vital, holding the power to extend or save lives.This, coupled with the financial security and social prestige associated with the profession, solidified the doctor’s position as a highly respected figure within Korea‘s hierarchical culture.
however,this position came with important demands. Years of demanding training and frequently enough arduous military service were prerequisites, reflecting the immense responsibility entrusted to those handling human life and enjoying considerable societal benefits.Increasingly, some doctors express a reluctance to embrace these traditional expectations, prioritizing efficiency and financial gain over the demanding aspects of the profession.
The current standing of doctors isn’t solely based on the achievements of the collective. It was earned through a dedication to the age-old human aspiration of extending life, a pursuit that garnered societal respect. Now, as simply prolonging life is no longer universally considered a paramount goal, some doctors are hesitant to shoulder the weight of that ancient expectation.
This is a critical moment for reassessment. In a world where mere existence isn’t enough, the role of the doctor must evolve. Doctors must prioritize the quality of life for their patients, focusing on understanding their needs and truly listening to their concerns. Perhaps empathy is more necessary for doctors in the future. It is time to seriously consider and re-evaluate the qualifications we demand of those entrusted with our health and well-being.
Reporter Kim Byung-chae
