Home » News » Doctors defend emergency department triage policy as ‘closing the gap in action’

Doctors defend emergency department triage policy as ‘closing the gap in action’

by Emma Walker – News Editor

Doctors‍ Defend St Vincent’s Hospital Emergency⁢ Department Triage Policy⁢ Amidst Political Debate

Melbourne, ​VIC – Medical professionals are defending a triage⁣ policy at St Vincent’s​ Hospital in Melbourne, arguing it represents progress in “closing the gap” in healthcare access for First Nations people, as‍ a political dispute over the initiative⁤ intensifies. The policy, which prioritises First Nations patients ⁤within the category three wait time bracket, has drawn ‍criticism from the Liberal and Nationals coalition, while ⁤health experts maintain ‌it is ethically sound and addresses systemic disadvantages.

Former nurse ie Crozier described the policy as “divisive” but stated it‌ does “not‍ contravene⁢ long standing ⁣multiple medical and nursing codes of​ conduct, and medical ‍ethical considerations”. ⁣She emphasized, “The triaging of⁣ patients should be based on medical need, not based on race.”

The Liberal and Nationals coalition claims Labor has neglected community and primary healthcare, positioning thier⁤ own approach as a solution for better health outcomes for​ all Victorians, including⁢ Indigenous communities.

However,a Victorian government spokesperson countered that emergency departments always prioritise the sickest ‌patients,adding⁤ that St Vincent’s ED⁤ team has “done ⁤remarkable ⁢work to close the gap ‍in category three wait times ⁤- the difference between First Nations patients and other patients is⁢ now just four minutes.”

Abe Ropitini,⁤ Population Health Executive director at the Victorian Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation (VACCHO) and a proud Māori and Palawa man, expressed disappointment that politicians are “using this‌ issue as a ⁤political football.” ​He asserted,​ “It is indeed a ​basic expectation of our health system that⁤ everybody is entitled to equitable ‌outcomes.”

Ropitini explained that ‌equitable outcomes require acknowledging that ⁤First nations people often face disadvantages when accessing healthcare, ‍stating, “Access to healthcare is a 50-metre⁢ race and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are starting 100 metres behind⁤ the start‍ line.” He also noted that VACCHO has received numerous concerns from ​the community regarding the divisive nature of the debate, notably given ongoing​ efforts to create ⁢more⁣ welcoming ⁢health spaces for First Nations people.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.