Home » News » Cutting Home Insulation Cuts Risk Climate Goals, Fuel Poverty

Cutting Home Insulation Cuts Risk Climate Goals, Fuel Poverty

by Emma Walker – News Editor

Concerns Rise over Potential⁢ Cuts​ to UK home Insulation Funding

Reports indicate the UK government is considering reallocating funds from the £13 billion warm homes plan, potentially impacting subsidies for electric heat pumps and, critically, funding for home insulation schemes ​like ⁣the⁣ ECO (energy Company Obligation) program. This ‌potential ‍shift has drawn sharp criticism from⁣ energy experts and environmental groups, who warn of meaningful economic and climate consequences.

James Dyson, a senior researcher at the non-profit E3G, ​highlighted the previous impact of ECO ‍cuts, stating, “The last time the ECO ⁤scheme was ‍cut, 10,000 ⁣people lost their jobs and millions‍ of families were ‘left in draughty homes ‌paying​ astronomical⁣ energy bills’ as an inevitable⁤ result.” He warned that further​ cuts could “collapse the‌ entire insulation industry,” leading to job losses in areas needing skilled ‌employment and ‍hindering‌ efforts to ​lower⁤ energy bills for low-income households. Dyson also ‍emphasized the climate implications, stating ⁣it would “rob us of a key tool‌ for⁢ lowering carbon emissions in this critical decade for climate ‍action.”

Dhara⁤ Vyas, chief executive of⁢ Energy UK, labelled the potential changes a “shortsighted and disastrous move,”‍ pointing to past experience demonstrating that cuts⁤ to investment in warmer⁢ homes have resulted in “customers ⁣paying‌ billions of pounds more on their energy ⁤bills,” alongside damage ‍to supply chains and businesses.

Greenpeace UK’s policy director, Dr‍ Doug Parr, argued that‍ slashing funding would be “the most counter-productive thing the chancellor could do in seeking⁢ to reduce energy costs.” He advocated for reform of existing programs to address issues with installer ⁢quality,but stressed that cuts would exacerbate fuel poverty. Parr suggested funding should be sourced through⁣ taxation, ensuring “those with the broadest shoulders pay a fairer share.”

Friends of the Earth’s head of⁤ science, policy‌ and research, Mike Childs, called it a “serious betrayal of struggling families” to cut the mandatory energy company insulation scheme to reduce energy bills, emphasizing the need for warmer homes and lower bills to “ease hardship ‍and shield people from harm.”

HM Treasury‍ responded with a statement indicating they do not ⁣comment on speculation​ outside of official fiscal events,‍ assuring that the upcoming budget will focus on ‍”cutting waiting lists,⁢ cutting the national ‌debt and cutting the‌ cost of living.”

Alongside the potential insulation ⁤funding changes, reports⁤ suggest Shadow Chancellor Rachel ​Reeves is planning to announce a‌ raid on tax breaks on pension ⁣contributions, potentially raising up to £2 billion annually. The ‍proposal, as reported in The Times, would cap salary sacrifice for⁢ pension contributions at £2,000 ‌a year, triggering concerns about potential costs being passed on to employees through an 8% national insurance contribution on ⁤earnings⁢ above that level.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.