Okay, I’ve read the article excerpt and can summarize the rankings and the reasoning behind them for the Pac-12 teams listed:
Here’s a breakdown of the Pac-12 teams mentioned, according to the article:
Washington State Cougars (Ranked #3):
Strengths: Historically, they’ve overachieved despite being out-resourced. They’ve been successful in the past against better programs.
Weaknesses: Major transition in 2025 with a new head coach (Jimmy Rogers) and starting quarterback leaving.Very inexperienced team with a large influx of freshmen and transfers. Rogers is an unknown at the FBS level. Recruiting is good but not the best in the new Pac-12.
Overall: Considered near the top of the league due to past performance and still operating like a Power 5 program. Future prospects are uncertain. Oregon State Beavers (Ranked #4):
Strengths: Have had periods of success, including a 10-win season in 2022. Still a Power 5 program in many ways.The 2025 signing class was the second-highest rated among all Pac-12 teams.
Weaknesses: Inconsistent performance historically. Frequently enough at the bottom of the Pac-12 in its previous version. Bray didn’t have a great debut season. Recruiting has been inconsistent.
Overall: Gets the benefit of the doubt due to past talent and brand recognition. Talent in the program suggests they should be in the top half of the league.
Texas State Bobcats (Ranked #5):
Strengths: Notable betterment under coach G.J. Kinne, with eight wins in each of the last two seasons. Ample investment in facilities and athletic infrastructure. Located in a talent-rich region of Texas. Now has Pac-12 membership to attract recruits.
Weaknesses: Least proven historically, only an FBS program as 2012. Recruiting needs to improve to compete with top G5 programs.
overall: High potential due to recent success, coaching, location, and investment. Could rise to the top of the Pac-12 in the future. Utah State Aggies (Ranked #6):
Strengths: Proven to be a good G5 program over the last decade, with multiple bowl appearances and conference championships. Has had success with multiple head coaches. Bronco Mendenhall is a proven program builder familiar with Utah. Weaknesses: Not a especially good program right now, with a losing record last season and a projected losing record in 2025.
Overall: Deserves to be ranked where it is indeed based on past performance. Mendenhall’s presence improves their prospects.
Key Takeaways:
The article emphasizes the transition period for Washington State and Oregon State as they adjust to the new Pac-12 landscape.
Texas State is seen as a program with significant potential for growth.
* Utah State’s ranking is based on past success and the potential impact of their new coach.
