Chris Pratt’s Mercy: Corporate Propaganda and AI Justice Gone Wrong

Okay, here’s a breakdown of the key points from the provided text, focusing on the reviewer’s criticisms of the film “Mercy”:

1. Visual and Plot Dullness:

* The reviewer finds the film visually unappealing and boring. Despite attempts to make the process of reviewing evidence dynamic (floating screens, 3D IMAX), it’s compared unfavorably to watching a film entirely on laptop windows (“War of the Worlds”).
* The core premise – a man strapped to a chair making phone calls – is inherently limited and unengaging.

2. Irresponsible Attitude Towards AI:

* The film promotes a problematic idea about cooperating with AI.
* Rather of emphasizing human qualities like ethics and understanding of law, the film suggests AI can be taught to think like humans, even to justify executing citizens.
* The ending is especially frustrating, as the protagonist and the AI become “friends,” and the film implies that “human or AI, we all make mistakes,” seemingly normalizing the idea of accepting errors from possibly lethal AI systems.
* The reviewer interprets this as a message to “humanize and respect the corporate-owned execution bots.”

3. Disregard for Legal Rights (Fourth Amendment):

* The headline “Mercy also hates the Fourth Amendment” suggests the film ignores or undermines the importance of legal protections against unreasonable search and seizure. (The text doesn’t elaborate on how it does this, but it’s a significant claim.)

Overall Tone:

The reviewer is deeply critical of “Mercy,” viewing it not just as a bad movie, but as a film with potentially harmful implications for how we think about AI, justice, and individual rights. The tone is strongly negative and concerned.