Home » World » Charlie Javice Cites Fertility Struggles in Bid for No Prison

Charlie Javice Cites Fertility Struggles in Bid for No Prison

by Priya Shah – Business Editor

Charlie ‌Javice,founder of the failed student loan⁢ fintech Frank,argued against imprisonment in a court filing on September 9,2025,citing ongoing ⁣fertility treatments and the emotional⁢ toll of⁣ incarceration on her prospects for motherhood. The 31-year-old Javice faces a potential prison sentence after ⁣being convicted in‌ June 2024⁤ of defrauding ​JPMorgan Chase out of $175 million.

The case centers⁣ on allegations that ​Javice fabricated data regarding Frank’s⁢ user base to induce ‌JPMorgan Chase to acquire ⁢the company in a $175 million deal. Prosecutors contend Javice created fake email lists and student loan applications to inflate the number of⁢ active Frank users, misleading JPMorgan Chase about the company’s true ​value.A sentencing ​hearing is scheduled for November 18, 2025,⁢ in Manhattan federal court.Javice’s legal team is now appealing to Judge Kelly, requesting a sentence of⁢ home confinement, arguing ⁤that imprisonment woudl jeopardize her ⁢fertility treatments and future family plans.

According to‌ court documents, Javice and her‍ husband have been⁣ undergoing in vitro fertilization ⁤(IVF) treatments for over a year. Her lawyers assert that the stress and disruption of imprisonment ​would ⁢significantly⁢ hinder her ability to continue these treatments and perhaps prevent her ‌from ever ⁣having children. ‍The filing details⁣ the emotional and physical demands ​of IVF, emphasizing the need for a stable‌ and supportive environment.

Javice was found guilty on four counts of bank fraud and conspiracy⁤ to commit bank fraud.⁤ Prosecutors presented evidence showing Javice‍ directed employees to generate fictitious data,⁢ and she personally sent misleading information to JPMorgan Chase. The government alleges Javice knowingly misrepresented Frank’s success to secure ⁣the acquisition, enriching herself in the process. javice‍ maintains her innocence, claiming she believed the data was accurate‌ at⁢ the time of the‌ sale.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.