Home » Sport » Brest PSG Penalty Controversy: VAR Decision Explained

Brest PSG Penalty Controversy: VAR Decision Explained

by Alex Carter - Sports Editor

Controversial Penalty Decision Upheld in Brest-PSG Match

The French Football⁢ Federation (FFF) refereeing department has ⁢defended the penalty awarded to Brest in their ⁤recent 3-0 loss to Paris Saint-Germain, following a lengthy and confusing ‍VAR ⁤review. The incident occurred ‍in the 51st minute after a ⁢free kick into the Brest box was headed towards goal‌ by Ludovic Ajorque, ultimately striking the arm of PSG’s​ Lee Kang-in.

Initially, ‌referee Jérémy Pignard awarded a corner, but the play ‍was then ‌reviewed by VAR. What followed was a nearly seven-minute delay, culminating in the penalty being first⁤ denied ‍by⁣ VAR, then‍ unexpectedly awarded moments later.

the FFF report ⁣details the VAR’s initial focus on two potential issues: a possible handball ⁣by Lee Kang-in and whether ajorque was offside when the ⁤free kick was taken.Though, the review then shifted to analyzing contact between the ball and kang-in’s arm, specifically noting a prior deflection off the defender’s face.

This led referee Pignard to personally review the footage, ultimately ⁢deciding to award the penalty‌ to Brest.​ The FFF‌ acknowledges the unusual sequence of events, stating the “complexity of the situation” – ⁣encompassing both the handball assessment and the offside check -​ contributed‍ to the extended delay.

According to the FFF, Kang-in’s arm position, extended away from his body with an elbow at a 90-degree angle, “artificially increases the surface covered by the defender’s body,” making it a handball ‌offense ‍according to ​the Laws of the Game. The department clarified that prior contact with the defender’s face is not a​ mitigating factor under‌ Law 12.

Despite upholding the decision, the FFF report notably does not explain why​ the penalty was initially overturned by VAR, only to be reinstated after a second review‍ and the referee’s ​personal intervention. The incident was further complicated by a brief interruption caused‍ by an object thrown onto the pitch as the corner was prepared ​to be taken before the initial VAR decision.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.