Home » World » Bladder Cancer Treatment: Non-Radical Approach for LS-SCBC

Bladder Cancer Treatment: Non-Radical Approach for LS-SCBC

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

Bladder-Sparing Approach Shows Promise for ⁣small-Cell bladder ⁣Cancer Patients

New research suggests patients with ⁣limited-stage small-cell ‍bladder cancer (LS-SCBC) may achieve survival rates comparable to ​those undergoing radical surgery with a less⁤ invasive, bladder-preserving treatment strategy. A ​systematic review and meta-analysis published in clinical Genitourinary‌ Cancer indicates that multimodal treatment utilizing transurethral resection ​of the bladder tumor (TURBT) with radiation-based multimodal chemotherapy (RBMMT) demonstrates non-inferiority ‌to cystectomy-based‌ multimodal therapy (CBMMT).

This finding offers a potential ⁣quality-of-life benefit for⁢ appropriate candidates, as it⁣ avoids the extensive recovery and potential complications associated with radical cystectomy – the complete removal of the bladder. LS-SCBC is a relatively rare and aggressive⁢ form of bladder cancer, impacting primarily older adults. The study analyzed data from five retrospective‌ studies encompassing 1041 patients aged 66 to 76 years, with follow-up⁢ periods ranging from 15 to 70 ​months.

Researchers led by Dr. Tibor Szarvas of ⁤Semmelweis University, University of Duisburg-Essen, and the German‍ Cancer Consortium, found median overall⁢ survival (OS) ⁣times of 34.6 months (95% CI, 25.5-43.7) with RBMMT and 29.7 months (95% CI, 18.2-41.1) with​ CBMMT. A sensitivity analysis at 60 ‌months showed no significant difference in OS between the two approaches ‌(0.83, 95% CI, 0.61-1.12; ⁣ P =.22).”The demonstrated noninferiority ‌of the less ⁤radical RBMMT approach supports its consideration‌ as a bladder-preserving option, especially for patients placing a ⁢high value on [quality of life],” Dr. ⁢Szarvas’ team stated. While acknowledging the limitations of relying on retrospective data and variations in⁣ treatment protocols, the researchers advocate for larger, prospective studies to refine optimal treatment strategies and identify patient subgroups who may benefit most from ⁤either organ-sparing or more aggressive interventions.

Reference: Kubik A, das Virgens IPA, Varga N, et al. Radical surgery compared to bladder-preserving approaches for limited stage small-cell bladder cancer: systematic review⁤ and meta-analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102389

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.