Baltimore Sun Reporter Katharine Wilson: Latest News & Updates
Maryland lawmakers are considering legislation that would restrict private ownership of zebras and capuchin monkeys, among other exotic animals. The bills, debated in the state legislature this month, come as concerns grow over the safety and welfare of both the animals and the public, according to reporting from the Baltimore Sun.
One measure, proposed in the Maryland Senate, would prohibit the private possession of certain exotic animals, including zebras, lions, tigers, bears, and primates like capuchin monkeys. Exceptions would be made for accredited zoos, research institutions, and individuals with specific permits for educational or conservation purposes. The bill’s proponents cite instances of dangerous encounters and the challenges of providing adequate care for these animals in a private setting.
A separate, related bill addresses the regulation of dangerous animals already in private ownership. It would require owners to register their animals with the state and meet specific standards for housing, care, and insurance. Failure to comply could result in fines or the seizure of the animal.
The legislation arrives as the Maryland General Assembly as well considers a ban on cellphones in public schools, a measure passed by the Senate on March 22, 2026, and slated to take effect by the 2027-28 school year. While seemingly unrelated, both bills reflect a broader trend of lawmakers addressing public safety and welfare concerns through increased regulation.
Meanwhile, Maryland Governor Wes Moore’s administration has paused consideration of a proposed gas tax holiday, citing rising fuel prices. The initial proposal, championed by Republican lawmakers, aimed to provide temporary relief to consumers at the pump, but officials now believe the economic benefits would be limited and the potential disruption to state transportation funding too significant. This decision underscores the complex budgetary considerations facing the state government as it navigates competing priorities.
Advocates for the exotic animal legislation emphasize the potential risks associated with private ownership. They point to the specialized care requirements, the potential for escapes, and the inherent dangers posed by large or predatory animals. Opponents, however, argue that responsible owners should not be penalized and that the bills could unfairly restrict legitimate hobbies and educational opportunities.
The bills are currently under review by committees in both the House and Senate. Legislative staff have not yet announced a timeline for further action, and the outcome of the debate remains uncertain. The Maryland Department of Natural Resources has not yet issued a formal statement on the proposed legislation.