Home » Sport » Anderlecht: Coosemans’ Decline Sparks Contract Concerns

Anderlecht: Coosemans’ Decline Sparks Contract Concerns

by Alex Carter - Sports Editor

Anderlecht Contract Talks with Key Goalkeeper Coosemans Reach Critical point

Brussels, Belgium – Contract negotiations with Anderlecht goalkeeper Colin Coosemans have become increasingly complex ⁢as ‌performance data reveals a shift in his impact, raising questions about his future role ⁣and ‌salary expectations. ⁣While ‍Coosemans remains teh club’s number one,recent statistics suggest a decline from his standout form last season,prompting ⁤Anderlecht to consider multiple scenarios ahead of⁣ potential renewal talks.

Last season, Coosemans conceded 0.91 goals per 90 minutes and emerged as a ⁤vocal leader, bridging generational and ⁢linguistic gaps within the squad.However, current season figures show a ​slight increase to‌ 0.92 goals per‍ 90,‍ despite facing fewer ⁣shots (down from 4.18‌ to 2.98 per ‌90). ​ His save percentage has dropped to 69.2%,and he currently has a prevented goals rate of -0.96.

A notable change ‍in playing style also impacts the assessment. Passes ‌per 90 have decreased from 33.7 to 21.6, coinciding with a ‍more direct approach from Anderlecht.The percentage of long passes initiated by Coosemans has risen from 45% to 60%.

Anderlecht recognizes Coosemans’ value, having benefited from a +7.17 points gain above expectations last season. Currently, after‌ eight matches,⁣ the performance‍ metric⁤ is‍ slightly negative, though ‍the team has secured‌ four clean‌ sheets, including two consecutive.

Goalkeeper‍ coordinator Silvio Proto acknowledged ⁢Coosemans’ past contributions, stating, “Colin was the star of Anderlecht last season and we should not forget that, but it is normal to⁢ think about the‍ future.”

Anderlecht is currently evaluating three potential paths ​forward: ⁢

  1. Contract Extension: ⁢Offer a salary increase reflecting his ⁣current status as captain, prioritizing stability and sending a positive message to the team. This option risks rewarding Coosemans based on ⁢his previous peak performance.
  2. Delayed Evaluation: Maintain the option to extend while⁣ assessing his performance over the next⁢ 15-18 matches. This allows for a data-driven decision but introduces uncertainty regarding the captaincy.
  3. Explore Alternatives: proactively‌ scout potential replacements, potentially leveraging market interest to moderate Coosemans’ salary demands. This carries the risk of losing​ a key player and disrupting team⁤ continuity.

The club ‌explored‍ potential goalkeeper options earlier this year, ​including ‍Thomas Kaminski in June and‍ Gaëtan Coucke,‌ with kjell Peersman also considered ⁢as a backup. A decision regarding Coosemans’ future is expected in the coming months.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.