Home » News » A teenager who worked at a rural tourism homestead did not imagine what would end: the verdict said the Labor Inspectorate

A teenager who worked at a rural tourism homestead did not imagine what would end: the verdict said the Labor Inspectorate

by Emma Walker – News Editor

Rural‌ Homestead Owner Fined for Employing Teenager Illegally

Klaipėda District, Lithuania ​- September ‌18, 2025 – A Klaipėda region farmer has been ​penalized ⁢by the State ⁢Labor Inspectorate (VDI) after a probe revealed the unlawful employment of a 16-year-old boy at a property used for event ​rentals.⁢ The case ‌highlights ongoing concerns regarding labor law compliance within⁣ Lithuania’s burgeoning rural tourism sector.

The examination,initiated following reports to Lrytas news,centered on activities at a homestead​ located at Liaunų ‍g. 2, Liaunai village, Klaipėda District. A. Terespolskis,⁢ the property owner, maintained the teenager was employed directly by him, not⁤ by UAB ⁤”Memelio dvaras” (Memel Manor), a company registered at Vilties g. 7-3A in‌ Klaipėda. Terespolskis stated, “That boy didn’t work at ‘Memelio dvaras’ in any way. He worked for me on the farm… I live here, I am registered here, this is my homestead. I rent out my ⁣living ⁤house for events, and this is​ where my farm is registered.” Though, the ‌VDI determined the work was conducted illegally.

According ‌to public records on rekvizitai.vz.lt,UAB “Memelio dvaras” lists ‍its registration address as Vilties g. 7-3A,⁣ Klaipėda, while ⁢its⁣ website, www.memeliodvaras.lt,advertises events at the Liaunų g.2 location. Further complicating the matter, A. Terespolskis also leads a public institution, “Events Code,” registered at the same address as ⁤UAB “Memelio dvaras” – Vilties g. 7-3A, Klaipėda.

The VDI confirmed to​ Lrytas that its investigation substantiated‌ the illegal employment of two individuals, including the minor born in‌ 2009, at the Liaunų g. 2 address under the direction⁣ of A. Terespolskis. ⁣

A. Terespolskis now ‌faces an administrative offense protocol under Article 95, paragraph ​1 of the Lithuanian Code of Administrative Offences (ANK). Penalties for this ⁢violation range from €2,000 ⁢to €5,000 for individual employers. as the employer in this ‍case is a private individual,only that penalty applies. The⁣ VDI has not disclosed the ​amount of the final‌ fine levied against A.Terespolskis.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.