Augusta County Board Rejects MOU, Moves Forward with Affordable Housing Partnership

by Emma Walker – News Editor

Summary of Augusta County Housing Discussions: MOU Rejection ⁢& Builder Collaboration

This article details two key discussions regarding housing in Augusta ​County,Virginia,during a recent⁣ Board of Supervisors meeting.

1. MOU Rejection:

* ⁣A proposed Memorandum of Understanding ⁢(MOU) ⁤between Augusta County and several housing-focused entities (including Habitat for Humanity, Valley Blue Ridge, and others) ⁣was unanimously rejected by the board.
* ​ Purpose of the MOU: The MOU ‌aimed to formalize existing collaborative ⁤efforts to ⁤address community housing needs, ⁢provide technical‌ assistance,‍ leverage ⁤resources, and engage the ‍public.
* Arguments for the MOU: Jennifer Whetzel ​(Deputy County Administrator) stated it would strengthen partnerships and improve chances ⁢of securing funding.
*⁤ ⁤ Arguments against the MOU⁢ (led by Supervisor Scott Seaton): ‍Seaton⁢ believed the county didn’t need ⁣ the agreement, feared creating a new “entity,” and was concerned about adding ⁤to the workload ⁢of ‍already busy county⁣ staff.⁢ He felt the‌ existing informal collaboration was sufficient.

2. Collaboration‌ with Augusta Home Builders Association:

* Scott Williams, president of the Augusta Home Builders Association (representing 110 members), addressed the ⁣board, expressing concern about rising housing costs despite previous attempts at collaboration.
*⁢ ‌ Builder’s Request: the Association requested the Board approve engagement ‍between county staff and‍ the development community to ⁢brainstorm⁢ solutions for increasing‌ affordable ⁤housing.They emphasized the urgency of the situation.
* Board‍ Response: Supervisor Carolyn Bragg supported the request and asked county ⁢staff to work with the Association to develop proposals.
*‍ The article notes that‍ a current county ordinance is also ​being considered ‍(though details are ​not provided⁤ in this excerpt).

In essence: The county⁣ rejected a formal⁣ agreement to collaborate on housing, ‌but did ⁤ agree to ‌work with local builders to​ explore solutions to the ⁣housing ⁤affordability issue. This suggests a preference for‌ direct⁣ engagement with the development community⁤ over a broader, ⁤formalized partnership.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.