Bridging the Digital Divide: Examining Patient Portal Engagement Among Older Adults with Chronic Conditions
Published: 2026/01/14 14:46:17
The rise of patient portals has revolutionized healthcare access, offering individuals unprecedented control over their medical information and communication with providers. However, the benefits of these digital tools aren’t universally shared. A recent study, leveraging 13 years of electronic health record (EHR) data from the M Health Fairview system, sheds light on notable disparities in patient portal engagement among adults 50 and older managing chronic health conditions. The findings underscore a critical need for targeted strategies to ensure equitable access and utilization, particularly for vulnerable populations.
The Promise and Peril of Patient Portals
Patient portals – secure online platforms linked to a patient’s EHR – offer a wealth of advantages. These include improved communication with healthcare teams, greater patient empowerment through access to medical records, streamlined administrative tasks, and reduced reliance on phone calls and in-person visits. For individuals with chronic illnesses requiring ongoing monitoring, these benefits are particularly pronounced.
Tho, realizing the full potential of patient portals requires widespread adoption and consistent use. Despite growing overall usage – a recent national survey indicates approximately 78% of Americans aged 50-80 utilize at least one portal15,16 – significant gaps persist.These gaps are not random; they are often linked to systemic inequities and individual challenges.
Unpacking the Disparities: Key Findings from the M Health Fairview Study
The retrospective study analyzed data from 250,345 adults aged 50 and older with at least one chronic condition. Researchers found that 61% of patients had activated a MyChart account (the portal used by M Health Fairview), and 54% logged in at least once between 2011 and 2024. However, a closer look revealed stark differences based on several key demographics:
* Age: Portal activation dropped significantly with age. Only 49% of those 65 and older had activated an account, and just 42% had used it.
* Race & Ethnicity: black patients exhibited lower activation (43%) and usage (40%) rates compared to White patients (62% and 55%, respectively). Significant disparities were also observed among non-English speakers, with activation rates of 38% for Hmong speakers, 21% for Somali speakers, and 28% for Spanish speakers.
* Education: Educational attainment played a role, with those lacking a high school diploma showing the lowest usage (53%) and those with a General Educational Development (GED) or high school diploma at 76%.
* Chronic Conditions: Patients with certain conditions were more or less likely to engage with the portal. those with neoplasms (cancers),diabetes,ischemic heart disease,and hypertension demonstrated higher engagement,while those with heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) had lower rates.
Furthermore, the study revealed a correlation between portal use and healthcare engagement. Patients who actively used the portal tended to have more completed healthcare encounters,suggesting a link between digital access and proactive health management.
Why the Disparities? A Multifaceted Challenge
The observed disparities aren’t simply a matter of access to technology. A complex interplay of factors contributes to the digital divide in healthcare:
* Digital Literacy: Older adults and individuals from underserved communities may lack the digital skills and confidence needed to navigate online platforms.
* Language barriers: Portals frequently enough lack adequate language support, creating a significant obstacle for non-English speakers.
* Socioeconomic Factors: Limited access to reliable internet and devices, coupled with financial constraints, can hinder portal adoption.
* health Literacy: Understanding medical information and navigating complex healthcare systems can be challenging, even for those pleasant with technology.
* Portal Design & Usability: Poorly designed portals with confusing interfaces can discourage use, particularly among those with limited digital experience.
* Provider Encouragement: A lack of proactive encouragement from healthcare providers can also contribute to lower adoption rates.
Addressing the Inequities: Strategies for Inclusive Digital Health
Closing the digital divide requires a multifaceted approach focused on accessibility, usability, and targeted outreach.Here are some key strategies:
* Multilingual Support: Providing portal interfaces and support materials in multiple languages is crucial for reaching diverse patient populations.
* Simplified interfaces: Designing portals with intuitive, user-kind interfaces that prioritize clarity and ease of navigation.
* Digital Literacy Training: Offering free digital literacy training programs tailored to the needs of older adults and underserved communities.
* Community-Based Outreach: Partnering with community organizations to provide on-site support and assistance with portal enrollment and usage.
* Provider Integration: Encouraging providers to actively promote portal use and integrate it into routine clinical workflows.
* Low-Cost Access: Expanding access to affordable internet and devices for low-income individuals.
* Proxy Access: Facilitating proxy access for caregivers to assist patients who are unable to manage their portal accounts independently.
* Voice-Activated Assistance: Implementing voice-activated features to improve accessibility for individuals with visual impairments or limited dexterity.
* Culturally Tailored Content: Developing health information and educational materials that are culturally sensitive and relevant to diverse patient populations.
The Future of Patient Engagement: A call for Equity
The study’s findings serve as a critical reminder that technology alone cannot solve healthcare inequities. While patient portals hold immense promise for improving access and engagement, realizing that potential requires a intentional and equitable approach.
Moving forward, healthcare systems must prioritize strategies that address the root causes of the digital divide, ensuring that all patients – nonetheless of age, race, ethnicity, language, or socioeconomic status – have the opportunity to benefit from the power of digital health. This isn’t just a matter of technological advancement; it’s a moral imperative to create a healthcare system that is truly accessible and equitable for all.
key Takeaways:
* Lower portal usage was observed among older adults, non-English speakers, and Black patients, highlighting digital health equity gaps.
* 61% of adults 50+ activated their MyChart account, with 54% logging in at least once.
* Significant disparities existed in portal engagement based on age, race, language, and education.
* Patients with certain chronic conditions (neoplasms, diabetes, heart disease) showed higher engagement, while those with heart failure or COPD had lower rates.
* Addressing these inequities requires targeted strategies focused on accessibility, usability, and culturally sensitive outreach.
References:
- Milanfar L, Soulsby WD, ling N, O’Brien JS, Oates A, McCulloch CE. Automatic enrollment in patient portal systems mitigates the digital divide in healthcare: an interrupted time series analysis of an autoenrollment workflow intervention.J Med Syst. 2024;48(1):94.doi:10.1007/s10916-024-02114-7
- matthews AK, Steffen AD, Akufo J, et al. Factors associated with uptake of patient portals at a federally qualified health care center. Healthcare (Basel).2024;12(15):1505. doi:10.3390/healthcare12151505
- Ajayi KV, Wachira E, Onyeaka HK, Montour T, Olowolaju S, Garney W. The use of digital health tools for health promotion among women with and without chronic diseases: insights from the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022;10(8):e39520. doi:10.2196/39520
- Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Hoerbst A. Patient empowerment by electronic health records: first results of a systematic review on the benefit of patient portals. Stud Health technol Inform. 2011;165:63-67. doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-735-2-63
- Johnson AM, Brimhall AS, Johnson ET, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of patient education through patient portals. JAMIA Open. 2023;6(1):ooac085. doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac085
- Neves AL, Freise L, Laranjo L, Carter AW, darzi A, Mayer E. Impact of providing patients access to electronic health records on quality and safety of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;29(12):1019-1032. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010581
- Yoon E, Hur S, Opsasnick L, et al. Disparities in patient portal use among adults with chronic conditions. JAMA Netw open. 2024;7(2):e240680. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0680
- Tome J, Ahmed S, Fagerlin A, et al. Patient electronic health record portal use and patient-centered outcomes in CKD. Kidney Med. 2021;3(2):231-240.e1.doi:10.1016/j.xkme.2020.11.014
- Aboumatar H, Pitts S, Sharma R, et al.Patient engagement strategies for adults with chronic conditions: an evidence map. Syst Rev. 2022;11(1):39. doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01873-5
- Graetz I, Gordon N, Fung V, Hamity C, Reed ME. The digital divide and patient portals: internet access explained differences in patient portal use for secure messaging by age, race, and income. med Care. 2016;54(8):772-779. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000560
- Trinh M, Hattakitjamroen V, Rogers WA. Understanding older adults’ motivations to use digital health portals. Hum Factors Health. 2024;6:100079. doi:10.1016/j.hfh.2024.100079
- Beal LL, kolman JM, Jones SL, Khleif A, Menser T. Quantifying patient portal use: systematic review of utilization metrics. J Med Internet res. 2021;23(2):e23493. doi:10.2196/23493
- Dickman Portz J, Powers JD, Casillas A, et al. Characteristics of patients and proxy caregivers using patient portals in the setting of serious illness and end of life. J Palliat med. 2021;24(11):1697-1704. doi:10.1089/jpm.2020.0667
- Richwine C,Johnson C,Patel V. Disparities in patient portal access and the role of providers in encouraging access and use.J am Med Inform Assoc. 2023;30(2):308-317. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac227
- Anthony D, Singer D, Kirch M, et al. Use and Experiences With Patient Portals Among Older Adults. University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging; May/June 2023. Accessed January 4, 2025. https://ihpi.umich.edu/national-poll-healthy-aging/reports-and-resources/use-and-experiences-patient-portals-among-older
- Sakaguchi-Tang DK, Bosold AL, Choi YK, Turner AM. Patient portal use and experience among older adults: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform. 2017;5(4):e38. doi:10.2196/medinform.8092
- Chen Y, Kruahong S, Elias S, et al. Racial disparities in shared decision-making and the use of mHealth technology among adults with hypertension in the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey: cross-sectional study in the United States. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25(1):e47566. doi:10.2196/47566
- Hefner JL, MacEwan SR, Biltz A, Sieck CJ. Patient portal messaging for care coordination: a qualitative study of perspectives of experienced users with chronic conditions. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20(1):57. doi:10.1186/s12875-019-0948-1
- Portz JD, Bayliss EA, Bull S, et al. Using the technology acceptance model to explore user experience, intent to use, and use behavior of a patient portal among older adults with multiple chronic conditions: descriptive qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(4):e11604. doi:10.2196/11604
- McCleary NJ, greenberg TL, Barysauskas CM, et al. Oncology patient portal enrollment at a complete cancer center: a quality improvement initiative. J Oncol pract.2018;14(8):e451-e461. doi:10.1200/JOP.17.00008
- National Center for Chronic disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP).CDC. Accessed july 16, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/
- Sadasivaiah S, Lyles CR, kiyoi S, Wong P, Ratanawongsa N.Disparities in patient-reported interest in web-based patient portals: survey at an urban academic safety-net hospital. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(3):e11421. doi:10.2196/11421
- Hing E, Burt CW. Are there patient disparities when electronic health records are adopted? J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20(2):473-488. doi:10.1353/hpu.0.0143
- Pant D, Nytrø Ø, Leventhal BL, et al. Secondary use of health records for prediction, detection, and treatment planning in the clinical decision support system: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis mak. 2025;25(1):190. doi:10.1186/s12911-025-03021-8
- Park J, Guo S, Liang M, Zhong X. Investigation of the causal relationship between patient portal utilization and patient’s self-care self-efficacy and satisfaction in care among patients with cancer. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025;25(1):12. doi:10.1186/s12911-024-02837-0
- Turner K, Hong YR, Yadav S, Huo J, Mainous AG.Patient portal utilization: before and after stage 2 electronic health record meaningful use. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019;26(10):960-967.doi:10.1093/jamia/ocz030
- An D, Lim M, Lee S. Challenges for data quality in the clinical data life cycle: systematic review.J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e60709. doi:10.2196/60709
- Reed ME, Huang J, Brand RJ, et al. Patients with complex chronic conditions: health care use and clinical events associated with access to a patient portal. PLoS One.2019;14(6):e0217636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217636
- Shah A,Fiala MA.disparities in access and utilization of electronic health record patient portals. J Gen Intern Med. 2025;40(10):2233-2239. doi:10.1007/S11606-025-09359-z
- Turner K,Clary A,Hong YR,alishahi Tabriz A,Shea CM. Patient portal barriers and group differences: cross-sectional national survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e18870. doi:10.2196/18870
