Home » World » ‘OBR chief resigns’ and ‘Reeves clings on’

‘OBR chief resigns’ and ‘Reeves clings on’

by Lucas Fernandez – World Editor

The head of⁣ the Office for⁤ budget Duty (OBR), ⁣Richard‍ Hughes, has resigned from his post, just weeks⁤ after ‍delivering a ​forecast that underpinned the Conservative​ Party’s pre-election tax cut ⁣pledges. The move, ‌announced on december 2, 2025, throws further uncertainty into the economic⁢ landscape ahead of‌ the upcoming general election ‌and raises questions about the independence of‌ the fiscal watchdog.

Hughes’s departure ⁢follows scrutiny of the OBR’s assessment that Chancellor Jeremy Hunt had sufficient fiscal‌ headroom ⁢to implement the 2% National Insurance cut announced in the⁣ Autumn Statement. Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves is facing ​continued‌ pressure over Labour’s ‌own spending plans, ​with the party ⁢struggling to convincingly demonstrate its fiscal ⁤responsibility amid accusations of a “black hole” in its proposals.

Hughes⁤ served as chair of ⁣the OBR for seven years, ‍overseeing numerous⁢ economic forecasts and independent analyses of government finances. his⁤ resignation is effective ⁣from February⁤ 2026.⁤ The OBR plays a crucial role in providing independent and objective analysis of the UK’s economic⁢ situation, and​ its forecasts are heavily relied upon by policymakers ⁤and financial markets.

The timing ⁣of Hughes’s exit is‌ particularly ⁤sensitive, coming as it does during a period of intense political and economic debate. The Conservative Party has repeatedly ‍emphasized its commitment ​to economic stability and responsible fiscal management,and the OBR’s forecasts have⁢ been central to that narrative. Labour,meanwhile,is attempting to position itself as the party⁣ of ⁢economic competence,but faces ongoing challenges in⁤ convincing voters of its credibility on the issue.

Reeves has defended ‍Labour’s⁣ plans,stating they are fully costed and will not lead to higher borrowing. However,the Conservatives continue to attack Labour’s proposals,claiming⁢ they are unrealistic and ⁢woudl damage ⁢the economy. The debate ​over fiscal responsibility ⁤is highly likely to dominate the remaining weeks ​of the election campaign.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.